Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT152 S4 Q7 ExplanationNutritionist: Contrary to popular belief

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Nutritionist: Contrary to popular belief, a high-calcium diet does not prevent osteoporosis (decrease in bone density). Rather, a low-protein diet with an abundance of fruits and vegetables and a minimum quantity of meat and dairy products is essential for the prevention of the condition. Weight-bearing exercise, essential, since bones thicken when they withstand regular resistance.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Each of the following, if true, would support the nutritionist’s

Answer choices, explained

  1. Supports #413% picked this

    Astronauts who have lived in the weightless environment of space have exhibited decreases in bone density

    We knew that "preventing osteo requires weight-bearing exercise". So if you're in a weightless environment, you can't easily do weight-bearing exercise, and so you might start to develop osteoporosis, which is a decrease in bone density.

  2. Correct78% picked this

    Certain medical therapies that do not involve special diets can be effective means

    Why this is right

    This answer choice conflicts with what we were told. We were told that a special diet (low protein, lots of fruits/veggies, a bit of meat/dairy) was essential to preventing osteoporosis. That means, if no special diet, can't prevent osteoporosis This answer choice is talking about a scenario in which you do not have a special diet, but it's still effective at preventing osteoporosis.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Supports #12% picked this

    Populations in countries with the lowest per capita rates of protein consumption have some of the

    This reinforces the idea that low-protein is required to prevent osteoporosis. Countries with lower protein consumption have lower osteoporosis rates. In order to prevent osteoporosis, you need 1. low protein 2. lots of fruit veggies 3. a modest amount of meat and dairy 4. weight-bearing exercise

  4. Supports 1st Sentence4% picked this

    Arctic peoples, who consume large amounts of calcium, exhibit one of the highest rates of

    This reinforces the first claim, that high-calcium is not the way to prevent osteoporosis. After all, look at these people who eat tons of calcium. They have some of the most osteoporosis of anyone!

  5. Supports #13% picked this

    The incidence of osteoporosis is unusually low among strict vegetarians with

    This one's the weirdest of the four we're eliminating. It reinforces the connection between low-protein and low incidence of osteoporosis. But the strict vegetarian thing seems to go against the idea that "a minimum amount of meat and dairy" are required. Given that a strict vegetarian diet would have no meat, it seems like in conditional thinking this would be a deal breaker. But apparently LSAT wants us to think of this more in a squishy causal way -- like, you don't need the set of all four things to get some benefit in preventing osteoporosis. It's an abuse of the strict meaning of "essential", but this answer is still closer to helping the author than the correct answer is. The correct answer pretty much contradicts something. This one is just a bit muddled. Saying we have #1 but #3 are still seeing unusually low rates of osteoporosis does at least have a supporting component to it.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free