Logical Reasoning

PT152 · S1 · Q9 Legal doctrine: The government cannot

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Legal doctrine: The government cannot appropriate private property without offering fair compensation to the property owner.

Doctrine

If the government appropriates private property, they need to offer fair compensation to the owner.

Application

If the government blocks construction on empty lots on the lake shore (thereby diminishing the value of their market value), they need to offer fair compensation to the owners of those properties.

Evaluate

The divergence between the doctrine and the application deals with the trigger.

We need to establish that the government is appropriating private property, i.e. claiming land for the government's usage, even though people live there.

This Application is only talking about the government blocking construction / lowering market value. Is either one of those the same as appropriating private property?

Goal

Let's look for something conveying the idea that,

9.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most justifies the above application of the legal doctrine?

  1. A government should not implement

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: other types of property The normative language of "a government should not" is instantly off-putting. We're looking for connective tissue between "appropriating private property" and "forbidding construction on private property". This answer isn't talking about anything in that orbit.

    1% picked this

  2. Governments must balance the rights

    Out of Scope: wilderness

    We have no idea whether any area around Lake Crowell is considered a "wilderness" environment, so we don't know if this principle even applies to the Lake Crowell situation. We're looking for connective tissue between "appropriating private property" and "forbidding construction on private property / diminishing the market value of private property". This answer isn't talking about anything like that.

    2% picked this

  3. Correct

    Regulations that significantly diminish the

    Why this is right

    We were looking for connective tissue between "appropriating private property" and "forbidding construction on private property / diminishing the market value of private property". This answer gives us that. It says that "if a regulation would diminish the economic value of a piece of property, then that qualifies as appropriation of private property". So if a regulation denying the development of lakefront lots would diminish the value of those lots, then the government is appropriating those lots. Hence, it should offer fair compensation to the owners.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    96% picked this

  4. Owners of private property are

    Weakens

    The application is arguing that the government should owe these private property owners some compensation, given that the no-building regulation on the lakefront properties will have a negative economic effect on their properties. This answer, meanwhile, is saying, "Nah. The property owners shoulder all the risk. (The government don't owe them nothin'.)"

    1% picked this

  5. A government can appropriate private

    Out of Scope: compelling public interest

    We're not hoping to find new ideas in Principle answers. We're trying to link stuff together. The concept of "compelling public interest" was never discussed in the stimulus, so we don't want an answer to be talking about it. This principle would allow someone to prove that a government can't appropriate private property in a certain circumstance. Is that what the Application is trying to prove? No, the Application is trying to prove that when the government messes with people's property, they should give them fair compensation.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free