Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S4 Q12 ExplanationThe Amazon River flows eastward

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The Amazon River flows eastward into the Atlantic Ocean from its source in the western part of South America. The land through which the Amazon flows is now cut off from the Pacific Ocean to the west by the Andes Mountains. Yet certain freshwater fish that inhabit the Amazon are descended from some scientists hypothesize that the Amazon River once flowed into the Pacific Ocean.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following, if true, provides additional evidence in support of the hypothesis that the Amazon River once flowed

Answer choices, explained

  1. No Impact / Weak2% picked this

    In many cases, species of freshwater and saltwater fish that share certain characteristics do not in fact

    I'm happy that's the case, in many cases. Unfortunately, it's not the case in this case. Here, we're talking about a freshwater species that has a saltwater ancestor. So this answer isn't relevant to the conversation. (It's also very weakly worded and it sounds like it has the tone of pointing out an objection)

  2. Correct84% picked this

    Most of the fossilized remains of the now-extinct saltwater fish from the Pacific Ocean date to a period prior to the

    Why this is right

    This is suggesting that when this Pacific saltwater ancestor lived, the Andes Mountains had not yet formed. That increases the plausibility of the author's causal story -- she thinks that the freshwater fish in the Amazon whose ancestor is this Pacific saltwater fish got where it is because at some point the Pacific Ocean and the Amazon river were connected. In order for this storyline to work, it needs to be true that when the saltwater fish was alive, there was some connection between the Pacific and the Amazon. Since those two things are currently disconnected by the Andes Mountains, if the Andes Mountains didn't exist yet, then the two bodies of water could commingle.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Irrelevant Distinction / Weak10% picked this

    Many species of fish that inhabit the Atlantic Ocean are related to fish species that are known to

    Our conversation has a fish that inhabits the Amazon River, related to a fish that only inhabits the Pacific ocean, and that's a bit of a Curious Fact, since the Amazon and the Pacific are currently cut off from one another. This weak idea that "at least 5-10 species of fish in the Atlantic Ocean are related to something in the Pacific" has no impact on that conversation. The Atlantic and Pacific Ocean are not cut off from one another.

  4. No Impact2% picked this

    The Andes Mountains extend from the northernmost to the southernmost extremes of the

    This is just fleshing out what the concept of "cut off from the Pacific Ocean" means. Whether the mountains cut off the Amazon river by a straight vertical line or a diagonal line, or an L-shape, doesn't matter. They're currently cut off. This answer is focused on the present, whereas our hypothesis should have us wanting to get more information about the past.

  5. No Impact2% picked this

    There are very few fish species that are known to be able to survive in both

    This the third answer choice now that is just saying some generality about fish in the world. We need some specific information about the Amazonian freshwater fish that are descended from the Pacific-only saltwater fish, or more information about the Amazon River / Andes Mountains / Pacific Ocean.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free