Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT152 S3 P2 Q10 ExplanationDavid Bordwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Film scholar David Bordwell refers to the years 1917–1960 as the classical era of filmmaking in Hollywood. Bordwell defines the era’s style as being governed by straightforward narrative considerations, i.e., the need to follow well-defined characters through a chronological sequence of events, or plot. The technical elements of filmmaking—camera movement, lighting, editing, draw attention to the film as film rather than to the story are avoided.

Within this definition, the musical films of the 1930s are anomalous in that they interrupt narrative to present musical performances only tangentially related to the plot. In one film directed by Busby Berkeley, for example, a scene begins with a shot of an audience watching a singer. The singer’s face then fills differently motivated and constructed sequences abut so closely—fit comfortably within Bordwell’s definition of the classical style?

Bordwell’s response is that the musical, no less than comedy or melodrama (two other staples of the classical era), evolved from popular live theater. The musical’s conventions, Bordwell argues, cue viewers to expect a different structure—alternating narrative scenes and self-contained performances—from that of other genres, a structure that audiences are prepared for eventually come to accept them as conventions before generalizing about the realism of certain film styles.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct67% picked this

    The author states a scholar’s thesis, counters the thesis with an example, summarizes the scholar’s response to the example, points out a problem with

    Why this is right

    The last three ingredients here all come from the last paragraph, making this answer seem a little weird, but everything is accurate. The author state's Bordwell's thesis in the 1st paragraph, counters it in the 2nd paragraph with the example of musicals, summarizes Bordwell's response to the musical 'counterexample' in the beginning of the 3rd, and then the author shoots down the response and recommends an alternate research direction. The "But raising the issue of genre" part of the 3rd paragraph is where the author is pointing out her problem with Bordwell's response, and the final sentence is where the author is implicitly 'criticizing' the scholar's research by saying "what they really should be doing is ____ ".

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Multiple Mismatches2% picked this

    The author takes issue with a scholar’s thesis, provides an example in support of a counterthesis, summarizes the scholar’s response to the example, and

    This lacks a match for the first paragraph, so it looks like a good idea to bail early. The passage starts with a paragraph of Bordwell, not with the author taking issue with something. We would also find mismatches in terms of "counterthesis" (this doesn't happen -- it would sound like our author saying, "No, Bordwell, the real definition of the Classical style is ____ "), and thus we also couldn't say that at the end the author wants to replace Bordwell's thesis with a counterthesis.

  3. Example Doesn't Illustrate25% picked this

    The author states a scholar’s thesis, illustrates the thesis with an example, summarizes the scholar’s interpretation of the example, points out a problem with

    This is super close to being correct (and super close to resembling choice A), but the example of "musical films" is not meant to illustrate the thesis. It's meant to be a challenge to the thesis. The scholar doesn't interpret the example ... the scholar defends his thesis against the challenge.

  4. First and Last Bad Match3% picked this

    The author takes issue with a scholar’s thesis, provides an example illustrating the drawbacks of the thesis, summarizes the scholar’s response to the example,

    This lacks a match for the first paragraph, so it looks like a good idea to bail early. The passage starts with a paragraph of Bordwell, not with the author taking issue with something. The last ingredient is also awry. The author doesn't offer a new thesis to replace the scholar's; she just proposes a better direction for future inquiry.

  5. 2nd ingredient Mismatch3% picked this

    The author states a scholar’s thesis, presents the results of research supporting the thesis, counters the results with an example, summarizes the scholar’s response

    We do indeed start with a scholar's thesis, but we don't present the results of any research (and the 2nd paragraph is challenging the thesis, not supporting it). We can stop reading there. It is funny, though, to see "acknowledges the legitimacy of the response", since our author does not think Bordwell's defense of why musical films are included is a legit response.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free