Reading Comprehension

PT152 · S3 · P2 · Q13 David Bordwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Film scholar David Bordwell refers to the years 1917–1960 as the classical era of filmmaking in Hollywood.

Topic

Bordwell's definition of Hollywood's "classical period", as it relates to musicals

Framework

Challenge a Position

Main Point

Bordwell's explanation of how musicals fit within the realism of the "classical style" is not fully satisfying.

Summary

P1 - Introduction to Bordwell's "classical era"

This paragraph neutrally introduces Bordwell's characterization of the classical era -- basically, it was a realistic style that was all about telling a conventional story and making you forget that you were watching a movie. Stuff was only done to serve the interest of the narrative, not to call your attention to the fact that you were watching a work of visual art.

P2 - The Curious case of Musicals

It's weird that we don't get our central topic until the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, but the adjective "anomalous" is meant to have the same effect as our typical Purpose Pivot (usually using words like "but, yet, however, recently"). When we start with background and then pivot into something that feels like, "But this thing is different ... ", then we know that this different thing is what the author really wants to focus on.

This paragraph explains how musicals offer quite a challenge to the classical era definition, given that they have wacky musical numbers throughout the movie that are anything but realistic and don't have any purpose in advancing the story. The author innocuously asks whether musicals can be included in under the umbrella of classical era.

P3 - Bordwell's handling of "musicals" and the author's critique of that handling

Bordwell says,

The author ain't happy with this. She thinks it's really dodging the common sense issue that these musical numbers are totally un-realistic, and it also bothers the author that, as a viewer, you can plainly tell that the director is now just having fun as a visual artist, wants you to notice that, and doesn't any longer care about advancing the story.

The author is basically saying that even if an audience member said to themselves ahead of time, , the viewer would still notice the musical numbers as being a total break from reality.

The author concludes by trying to redirect the efforts of people like Bordwell so that they don't come back with crap they're currently selling, sayin' that musicals are realistic when they clearly aren't.

13.

Which one of the following, if true, would most call into question the position of Bordwell described in the first two sentences of the last paragraph?

  1. evidence that reviewers of musical

    Out of Scope: reviewers

    Bordwell's position in those two sentences is about audiences, not reviewers, so anything we learn about reviewers will be a stretch to connect to his position on audiences.

    31% picked this

  2. evidence that audiences went to

    Compatible

    This seems to gel fine with Bordwell's comments. He thinks audience members know musicals from live theater and accept its frequent musical performances. This answer just adds, "Not only do they accept them, that's the main draw!"

    8% picked this

  3. Correct

    evidence that viewers of musical

    Why this is right

    Bordwell's position in those first two sentences is that "because of having seen musicals in popular live theater, audiences who see musicals in a film are cued to expect the different structure of musicals and thus they accept random musical numbers as 'realistic' within the universe of the musical." This is a No Cause, Effect type of causality weakener. If people who haven't seen musicals in live theater are experiencing musical films the same way as people who have seen musicals in live theater, then Bordwell seems wrong to think that the latter group has been changed / cued to have different expectations and thus different experiences.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    52% picked this

  4. evidence that audience members tend

    Unclear Impact

    It's pretty hard to connect this totally vague answer to musicals vs. other films, or to the 1930s vs. other eras. "Attention span" in general is a pretty out of scope concept for the entire passage.

    3% picked this

  5. evidence that the musicals presented

    Strengthens

    We could have weakened by saying, "Yeah, but Bordwell, musical films are way different from musicals performed in live theater, so the expectations that audiences learned from live theater aren't going to be matched by what they see in a musical film." But this answer does the opposite, making the two things more fair to compare.

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free