Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT152 S2 Q16 ExplanationMost pet owners who take

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most pet owners who take allergy medication are allergic to pets. Therefore, since Chuck owns a pet dog, it is likely that he will take an allergy to pets.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following arguments exhibits flawed reasoning that is most similar to that exhibited by

Answer choices, explained

  1. Reversed Conclusion / Valid15% picked this

    Most cars taken to Acme Automotive Electronics have electrical problems. Therefore, it is likely that Anastasia’s car has electrical problems if she has

    This gives us the Most A's that are B are C. But it needs to conclude that, If this A is a C, then it's likely a B. or, equivalently, it it likely that B is true if C is true. The matching conclusion would have been, it is likely that A's car was taken to Acme if it has electrical problems. This conclusion actually is a valid inference from the Most premise.

  2. Correct72% picked this

    Most cars taken to Acme Automotive Electronics have electrical problems. Therefore, it is likely that Anastasia will take her car there

    Why this is right

    We have the same Most A's that are B are C We want a conclusion that's saying likely to be B, if C This conclusion does do that: likely to be Acme, if it has electrical problems What this argument and the original have in common that wasn't noted in our original breakdown of the argument is how the conclusion not only performs the reversed Most move, it also switches to a future tense. The original said, If he develops a pet allergy, he'll be likely to take allergy meds, since most people who take allergy meds have a pet allergy. This answer is saying If the car has electrical problems, she will likely go to Acme, since most people who go to Acme have electrical problems.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match2% picked this

    Most cars that are taken to Acme Automotive Electronics do not have electrical problems. Therefore, it is likely that Anastasia will not take her

    This conclusion involves some truth-value switching that the original argument didn't have. It goes from "do not have electrical problems" in the premise to "does have electrical problems" in the conclusion. And it goes from "do take to Acme" in the premise to "won't go to Acme" in the conclusion.

  4. Bad Conclusion Match2% picked this

    Most cars taken to Acme Automotive Electronics have electrical problems. Therefore, it is unlikely that Anastasia will take her car to Acme Automotive Electronics

    This conclusion flips a couple things: the original was saying "it's likely to be B, if C" This conclusion says "it's unlikely to be B, if not C"

  5. Inferior Conclusion Match8% picked this

    Most cars taken to Acme Automotive Electronics have electrical problems. Therefore, it is likely that Anastasia will take her car to Acme Automotive Electronics

    This is real close. But the conclusion gets into her beliefs: "if she thinks the car has electrical problems". The original didn't say, "if Chuck thinks he has developed an allergy".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free