Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S4 Q3 Explanation

Consumer: A new law requires all cigarette

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Consumer: A new law requires all cigarette packaging to display health warnings, disturbing pictures of smoking-related diseases, and no logos. This law will not affect the smoking habits of most people who smoke cigarettes regularly, since most packaging when they take out a cigarette.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

The conclusion of the consumer’s argument follows logically if which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Bad Trigger Match1% picked this

    If implementing certain regulations on the packaging of cigarettes would affect the smoking habits of those who smoke cigarettes regularly,

    We can contrapose this answer and get the conclusion on the right of the arrow. If regulations should then implementing these not be implemented ? new packaging regulations will not affect the smoking habits of regular smokers That conditional's outcome does match the conclusion! Is the trigger something we were told? Nope. We were never told that "these regulations should not be implemented". Since we have no way to trigger this rule, it does nothing for us.

  2. Bad Conclusion Match7% picked this

    If those who regularly smoke cigarettes look at disturbing pictures of smoking-related diseases frequently, it is likely to

    The right side of this arrow is saying that something "likely will affect smoking habits", but we're trying to prove that something "will not affect smoking habits", so this answer is functionally useless to us.

  3. Unrelated to Goal5% picked this

    Almost all people who regularly smoke cigarettes are already familiar with the risks that smoking

    This answer doesn't have any language about whether something "will / won't affect the smoking habits of regular smokers", so it's functionally useless and not worth reading.

  4. Correct83% picked this

    The new packaging cannot affect the smoking habits of people who regularly smoke cigarettes unless they frequently look at the

    Why this is right

    We can contrapose this answer and get the conclusion on the right of the arrow. If people don't then this frequently look at ? new packaging packaging when cannot affect the smoking taking out cigs habits of regular smokers That conditional's outcome does match the conclusion. Is the trigger something we were told? Yes. We were never told that "these regular smokers rarely look at the packaging when they take out a cigarette", so that means that "these regular smokers do not frequently look at the packaging when they take out a cigarette". The evidence fires the trigger on this rule, and the outcome delivers us the wording of the conclusion!

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unrelated to Goal4% picked this

    Most people who regularly smoke cigarettes would be unable to describe the logo of their usual brand of cigarettes

    This answer doesn't have any language about whether something "will / won't affect the smoking habits of regular smokers", so it's functionally useless and not worth reading.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free