Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S4 Q2 Explanation

Edgar: Nurses who have been specially trained

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Edgar: Nurses who have been specially trained in administering anesthetics should be allowed to anesthetize patients without having to do so under a doctor’s supervision. After safe in recent decades.

Janet: Although it’s true that nurse anesthetists receive excellent training, only doctors have the broader medical training to emergencies that can arise.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Edgar and Janet

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong4% picked this

    nurses should ever be allowed to

    This answer looks good at first glance, and the LSAT is trying to trick us by making this the first answer. Janet isn't claiming that nurses should never anesthetize patients. Her comments only indicate that she believes they should be supervised by a doctor when doing so.

  2. Both Agree0% picked this

    emergencies that can develop from anesthesia

    Janet states that emergencies are rare. Edgar describes anesthesia as remarkably safe, which is consistent with the idea that emergencies are rare.

  3. Out of Scope0% picked this

    nurses should be given more training in

    Neither person indicates that nurses should receive more training. Janet indicates that the training they currently receive doesn't enable them to handle emergencies the way doctors can. But she might or might not believe than nurses need more training. She might think that it's appropriate to let doctors handle these emergencies.

  4. Half Scope Both Agree1% picked this

    the safety of anesthesia has improved in

    Edgar states this. Janet says that emergencies are rare. Strictly speaking, we don't know if she agrees that safety has improved in recent decades. Even if we infer that from her statements, this would then be something they agree about, not a point of disagreement.

  5. Correct95% picked this

    the administration of anesthetics by a nurse should always be supervised

    Why this is right

    Edgar states that nurses should be allowed to anesthetize patients without being supervised by a doctor. Janet indicates that doctors need to supervise these nurses in order to handle emergencies that might arise.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free