Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S1 Q8 Explanation

Monarch butterflies must contend with

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Monarch butterflies must contend with single-celled parasites that can cause deformities that interfere with their flight. In populations of monarch butterflies that have not migrated, as many as 95 percent are heavily infected by the parasites, while less than 15 percent of those migrating allows monarch butterflies to avoid these parasites.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument overlooks

Answer choices

  1. No Impact6% picked this

    monarch butterflies are unable to detect which areas are free

    This doesn't provide an Alternate Explanation for why there's a correlation between migrating and not-being-infected with parasites. This also doesn't say anything that hurts the plausibility that migration helps the monarchs to avoid these parasites.

  2. Unclear Impact1% picked this

    long migrations are no better protection from parasites than are

    Does this hurt the plausibility of the idea that migrations allow monarchs to avoid these parasites? Not really. Do the migrations need to be of a certain length in order to help protect the butterflies? It's not clear what length that would be or why that would make a difference in terms of parasite-protection. There might be one month (let's say January) when the parasites thrive. If a butterfly has migrated away during January, it will be protected from the parasites, whether that butterfly is gone for a short 3 month migration or for a long 6 month migration.

  3. No Impact10% picked this

    populations of monarch butterflies that have not migrated are much larger

    The relative size of these populations doesn't matter. If we find out that 95% of left handed people get a disease X, while less than 15% of right handed people get disease X, we have good reason to suspect that disease X is connected to the genes that result in left-handedness. It doesn't make any difference that there are 8x as many right handed people in the world.

  4. Correct83% picked this

    monarch butterflies infected with parasites are typically unable

    Why this is right

    This provides the reverse cause Alternate Explanation we anticipated. It's not that migrating allows monarchs to avoid these parasites. It's that avoiding these parasites allows monarchs to migrate. We see arguments like, "People who attend exercise classes tend to be in better health than those who don't. Thus, exercise classes help improve your health", and LSAT wants us to consider the alternate, reverse cause interpretation of that correlation: maybe being healthy allows someone to attend an exercise class.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    populations of monarch butterflies tend not to migrate if they have

    Why populations do or don't tend to migrate doesn't matter to us, unless the basis for that decision relates to whether or not a butterfly population would have significant exposure to the parasites. But there's no common sense connection between whether or not a population has a stable food source and whether or no they're exposed to this parasite.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free