Reading Comprehension

PT152 · S3 · P4 · Q26 Carroll and Chen's Multiverse

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Physicists posit that at first our universe was infinitesimally small and infinitely hot and dense.

Topic

Starting conditions of the universe

Framework

Old/New

Main Point

Carroll and Chen are positing that the origins of our universe was a fluctuation of energy in cold, empty space, within a vast low entropy multiverse.

Summary

The first two paragraphs introduce some background information on the Big Bang inflationary period at the beginning of our universe, the view of C&C that this type of event isn't unique, and the emerging picture of the multiverse.

The third paragraph describes how C&C got to their view, via work on entropy, and then it explains what entropy is and provides an example.

The fourth paragraph brings together the two different threads: because of what we know about entropy, what we believe about the Big Bang seems like quite a mystery. The starting conditions for the Big Bang seem like extremely unlikely starting conditions. C&C's innovation (New) is saying that the most common starting condition would be cold, empty space.

The fifth paragraph, brings in the Recent (New) research of two other people, G&V, who are able to potentially explain how cold/empty space could give way to a fluctuation as big as the Big Bang.

The last paragraph ties it together: C&C think that our universe could have emerged from an energy fluctuation in cold, empty space, occurring in a high entropy multiverse, and they think this phenomenon would likely have occurred more than once.

26.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author presumes which one of the following to be true?

  1. The multiverse originated in a

    Out of Scope: multiverse's origin

    The passage never discusses or theorizes how the multiverse got started.

    7% picked this

  2. The initial state of our

    Not the Author

    This is definitely C&C's theory. Did our author ever sign off on this? I would keep it on a first pass and pick it if there wasn't an answer more directly supported. The author's last paragraph seems to still be at arm's-length. "On this view ... the initial state of our universe ..." Since the question stem is asking "it can be inferred" (i.e. it must be true that our author assumes this), our support is a little too weak to say that the author is now definitely assuming that our universe started in cold, empty space. She's definitely considering the idea, but to say she definitively believes it goes too far.

    24% picked this

  3. Correct

    A hot and dense state

    Why this is right

    This is more of a given than (B) was. The first two sentences of the 3rd paragraph firmly establish that the author is presuming this. "it's a mystery why there should have been a small, hot, and dense universe to begin with. Such a low entropy universe is extremely unlikely". The pronoun "such" is pointing back to "small/hot/dense", and so this second sentence is indicating that the author believes a "small/hot/dense" universe is a low entropy universe.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    50% picked this

  4. The multiverse is part of

    Out of Scope: system of multiverses

    The multiverse is supposed to be the name for the universe of universes. If we now say there's a multiverse of multiverses, where does it ever end? The author certainly cannot be said to definitely be presuming that "there is something bigger than our multiverse".

    13% picked this

  5. The second law of thermodynamics

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: why 2nd law formulated The passage doesn't give any information about why the 2nd law of thermodynamics was formed. Just because the flow of time is captured by the 2nd law doesn't mean that the 2nd law was formulated to answer a question about time. The calculations needed to run GPS systems are captured by quantum mechanics, but quantum mechanics wasn't formulated to solve the problem of Global Positioning Systems.

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free