Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S2 Q6 ExplanationResearchers studying athletes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Researchers studying athletes found that those who played mainly for the love of their sport actually had sharper vision during athletic competitions than those whose main goal was winning a trophy or championship. The vision of the first group of athletes was sharper because the concentration necessary for acute vision during by those whose attention is focused on the activity itself.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Too Strong: not important0% picked this

    Winning a trophy or championship is not important to athletes who play mainly for the

    People who plain mainly for the love can still find winning a trophy or title important. Just because something isn't your main reason for doing something, doesn't mean it's an unimportant reason for doing something. Maybe the main reason you'll pick Law School X will be because of school ranking, but that doesn't mean that financial aid considerations will not be important to you. In general, beware answer choices that feel like they're only pulling language from one sentence. The correct answer is almost always a crossover of ideas from 2 or more claims.

  2. Too Strong: lack adequate vision7% picked this

    If an athlete’s main goal during an athletic competition is winning a trophy or championship, that athlete will lack the concentration necessary

    This information we got would support the idea that athletes whose main goal is winning a trophy/championship have less sharp vision than people playing mainly for the love. But we can't say they would lack something required for adequate vision. If something is required for adequate vision, and you lack it, then you do not have adequate vision. Your vision is inadequate. That's too harsh. The paragraph is comparing how much of certain traits people have (Relative), not dealing with on / off ideas (Absolute), like "adequate / not adequate".

  3. Correct89% picked this

    Athletes who play mainly for the love of their sport concentrate more on the sport itself during athletic competitions than do athletes whose main

    Why this is right

    We know the athletes playing mainly for the love have sharper vision, and that sharper vision comes from having your attention focused on the activity itself. So athletes playing mainly for the love have more attention focused on the activity itself. This answer uses "concentrate on the sport" as a synonym for "attention is focused on the activity".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: impossible0% picked this

    It is impossible for an athlete to concentrate on more than one thing at a time

    There was no language as extreme as impossible in this paragraph. We were talking about people playing "mainly for the love", which allows for them playing somewhat for the trophy. It seems like that suggests you can concentrate on more than one thing.

  5. Too Strong: any4% picked this

    During athletic competitions, an athlete whose attention is focused on the sport itself will perform better than any athlete

    This is also guns blazing: every single athlete who's focused on the sport itself will perform better than all those who aren't focused on the sport itself. All we know is that being focused on the sport helps with sharper vision. Sharper vision is a positive thing, but it wouldn't guarantee that you perform better than the people with less sharp vision.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free