Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT152 S3 P4 Q23 Explanation

Carroll and Chen's Multiverse

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Physicists posit that at first our universe was infinitesimally small and infinitely hot and dense. It then underwent a period of extremely rapid, massive inflation (the Big continued to expand and cool.

According to physicists Sean Carroll and Jennifer Chen, the Big Bang was not a unique event; events like it happen periodically over an incredibly vast time scale. This is based on the suggestion of some physicists that the Big Bang was the beginning of our universe as we know it, but not which we can never see because it is beyond our “cosmic bubble.”

Carroll and Chen were initially interested in why time flows in only one direction. In physics the flow of time is captured by the second law of thermodynamics, which implies that entropy—a measure of total disorder—naturally increases with time. Entropy increases because there are more ways for a system to be disordered room are continually moved randomly, it is most likely that the room will get increasingly disordered.

While the Big Bang process and what followed obey the second law of thermodynamics, it is a mystery why there should have been a small, hot, and dense universe to begin with. Such a low entropy universe is an extremely unlikely configuration, not what scientists would expect from a randomly occurring initial cold, empty space—not an obviously favorable starting point for the onset of inflation.

Recent research has shown that even empty space has faint traces of energy that fluctuate on the subatomic scale. Physicists Jaume Garriga and Alexander Vilenkin have suggested that these fluctuations can generate their own big bangs in tiny areas widely separated in time and space. to be such fluctuations in a high entropy multiverse.

On this view, while the initial state that produced our universe would appear to be, taken by itself, a highly improbable one, in the vastness of the multiverse the creation of our universe is likely not even a unique event.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The claim in the fourth paragraph that an initial condition is likely to resemble cold, empty space is most strongly supported

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Paragraph6% picked this

    first

    The first paragraph more or less contradicts the idea that the most likely initial condition is cold, empty space, as it says that physicists posit the opposite.

  2. Wrong Paragraph5% picked this

    second

    The second paragraph establishes that Carroll and Chen are thinking that our universe is part of a broader multiverse, but thinking that way doesn't inherently provide any support to the idea that the most likely initial condition is cold, empty space. On its own, it's pretty neutral in relation to whether initial conditions were cold/empty or hot/dense.

  3. Correct39% picked this

    third

    Why this is right

    The reason they think that the most likely initial condition is cold, empty space, is that they are thinking about what would be likely for a randomly occurring initial condition. The most likely condition for any random spot of a universe / multiverse is cold empty space, and that's because of entropy / 2nd law of thermodynamics, which is discussed in the 3rd paragraph.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Wrong Paragraph47% picked this

    fifth

    The fifth paragraph starts to explain how a Big Bang could occur in cold, empty space, but it offers no justification for why we think that cold/empty space is the most likely initial condition.

  5. Wrong Paragraph4% picked this

    sixth

    The last paragraph consists of takeaways / implications of Carroll and Chen's ideas, not the support / basis for them.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free