Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT152 S3 P1 Q4 Explanation

Indus Valley Civilization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Along with Egypt and Sumer, the third major early Bronze Age civilization was the Indus Valley civilization, which flourished from 2600 B.C. to 900 B.C. In geographic size, the Indus Valley civilization was the largest ancient urban civilization, bigger than pharaonic Egypt. Centered on the Indus River and the now dry Ghaggar-Hakra civilization to be without parallel in history, displaying characteristics not elsewhere united in a single civilization.

The Indus Valley people, masters of urban planning, built brick cities on flood-proof terraces with grids of long, straight streets and the first urban sewer systems, made of masonry. No signs of dominant rulers have been found, and the cities’ living quarters show little sign of class distinction, suggesting that their system apparently thrived without armies—there is, for example, no evidence of weapon production.

The Indus Valley people were the first to cultivate rice and cotton, and they developed a carefully organized agricultural system to produce and distribute food. In addition, the Indus Valley civilization was one of the ancient world’s top traders. Examples of its standardized weights have been found in many harbors around the provide evidence that the Indus Valley people maintained trade with Mesopotamia.

The causes of the civilization’s decline, however, are not certain, and this has produced the most contention among scholars. A long-standing theory, one that today still inhabits history books, was proposed by British archaeologist Mortimer Wheeler in the 1920s and points to a final massacre by marauding Indo-Aryan invaders. But, in addition the course of rivers and disrupted many cities, spurring a migration of refugees to the countryside.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following is cited in the passage as evidence that directly

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: earthquakes1% picked this

    The Indus Valley is a seismically

    The three available answers we have, "no written evidence / no archaeological evidence / IA's weren't in region at the time" have nothing to do with whether or not the region is seismically volatile (prone to earthquakes).

  2. Correct94% picked this

    There are no findings that indicate battles within Bronze Age Indus

    Why this is right

    This matches the second of our available details: "there is no archaeological evidence of battles within the cities" Archaeological evidence would be like destroyed buildings, spearheads, forts, etc. So saying "there are no findings that indicate battles" is saying, "When archaeologists go looking for evidence of battles in these cities, they don't find anything".

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: drought5% picked this

    There is evidence of severe drought in the Indus Valley at the time of

    The three available answers we have, "no written evidence / no archaeological evidence / IA's weren't even in region" have nothing to do with whether or not there was a drought.

  4. Out of Scope: dominant rulers1% picked this

    No signs of dominant rulers of the Indus Valley civilization have been found

    The three available answers we have, "no written evidence / no archaeological evidence / IA's weren't even in region" have nothing to do with whether or not there are signs of dominant rulers, only whether there are signs of battles within the cities.

  5. Out of Scope: agriculture0% picked this

    The Indus Valley people practiced

    The three available answers we have, "no written evidence / no archaeological evidence / IA's weren't even in region" have nothing to do with whether or not the people practiced agriculture.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free