Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT152 S3 P1 Q5 ExplanationIndus Valley Civilization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Along with Egypt and Sumer, the third major early Bronze Age civilization was the Indus Valley civilization, which flourished from 2600 B.C. to 900 B.C. In geographic size, the Indus Valley civilization was the largest ancient urban civilization, bigger than pharaonic Egypt. Centered on the Indus River and the now dry Ghaggar-Hakra civilization to be without parallel in history, displaying characteristics not elsewhere united in a single civilization.

The Indus Valley people, masters of urban planning, built brick cities on flood-proof terraces with grids of long, straight streets and the first urban sewer systems, made of masonry. No signs of dominant rulers have been found, and the cities’ living quarters show little sign of class distinction, suggesting that their system apparently thrived without armies—there is, for example, no evidence of weapon production.

The Indus Valley people were the first to cultivate rice and cotton, and they developed a carefully organized agricultural system to produce and distribute food. In addition, the Indus Valley civilization was one of the ancient world’s top traders. Examples of its standardized weights have been found in many harbors around the provide evidence that the Indus Valley people maintained trade with Mesopotamia.

The causes of the civilization’s decline, however, are not certain, and this has produced the most contention among scholars. A long-standing theory, one that today still inhabits history books, was proposed by British archaeologist Mortimer Wheeler in the 1920s and points to a final massacre by marauding Indo-Aryan invaders. But, in addition the course of rivers and disrupted many cities, spurring a migration of refugees to the countryside.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

The author would be most likely to agree with which one of

Answer choices, explained

  1. Too Strong: most likely4% picked this

    Because the Indus Valley region is prone to earthquakes, it is most likely that an earthquake destroyed

    This answer would be fine if it said "it is possible / plausible", but the author never elevates this hypothesis to the level of #1 most likely.

  2. Too Strong: only4% picked this

    Only a disaster as catastrophic as an earthquake would have caused the demise of a civilization as sophisticated

    The author is saying that the end of the IVC was probably due to a catastrophic environmental reason. I don't know if the "drought" hypothesis counts as "a disaster as catastrophic as an earthquake", but the fact that the author isn't even saying it needs to be a catastrophic disaster, just that it most likely was that, is enough to get rid of this answer.

  3. Correct77% picked this

    Archaeologists’ understanding of the decline of the Indus Valley civilization would benefit from a search for signs of

    Why this is right

    Since the author thinks that a massive earthquake may have been the reason for the downfall of the IVC, and since the cause of the civilization's decline is still not certain, we can presume she would say "let's investigate the drought hypothesis more. Let's investigate the earthquake hypothesis more."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: should have prepared0% picked this

    The cities of the Indus Valley civilization should have been better prepared for the possibility

    The author is never scolding the IVC for having not sufficiently prepared for an earthquake. She's sympathetically thinking, "This IS a seismically volatile region, so I can see a big quake having messed things up."

  5. Too Strong: most likely15% picked this

    The demise of the Indus Valley civilization was most likely caused by the catastrophic alteration of the courses

    This answer would be fine if it said "possibly / plausibly caused" by catastrophic alteration of rivers, but the author never elevates this hypothesis to the level of #1 most likely.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free