Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT152 S1 Q13 Explanation

When so many oysters died

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

When so many oysters died off the coast of Britain that some native species were threatened with extinction, the fact that the water temperature had recently risen was at first thought to be the cause. Later, however, the cause was determined to be the chemical tributyl tin (TBT), used to keep barnacles waters, yet the populations of the endangered oyster species have not grown.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the failure of the native oyster

Answer choices

  1. No Impact3% picked this

    The increase in water temperature has slowed in the years since the

    Water temp was thought to be a cause at first, but it was determined that TBT was the cause. So we wouldn't really be able to use a story line about water temperature to explain the low oyster population.

  2. No Impact10% picked this

    Native oysters rely on different sources of food than do the barnacles that live on

    If native oysters and barnacles relied on the same food source, then we could potentially say that an uptick in barnacles could mean that there's not enough food left for oyster populations to grow. But this answer says they rely on different sources of food, so it has no impact.

  3. Correct75% picked this

    TBT also killed imported varieties of oysters that flourish at the expense of native oysters now that

    Why this is right

    Since TBT was previously killing imported oysters, now that there's no TBT, we're not killing these imported oysters. Does having these imported oysters around give us a way to explain why the native populations aren't coming back? Yes, because it says that imported oysters flourish at the expense of native oysters. So in the post-TBT warm waters near Britain, we would expect to see populations of imported oysters thriving and populations of native oysters shrinking / being suppressed. This is an example of the TBT-ban legislation having an indirect effect on the endangered oysters: TBT-ban → way less TBT → more imported oysters -> suppressed native oysters

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: other chemicals Opposite3% picked this

    Other chemicals that are used to remove barnacles from the hulls of boats seem to have little effect

    We're not really concerned with other barnacle-removing chemicals. We only cared about TBT because it was determined to be killing our native oysters. And we're trying to explain why in the aftermath of banning TBT we still don't see the native oysters coming back. We might have thought to ourselves, "Maybe after they banned TBT, ships started using a different chemical to get barnacles off the hulls of boats, and those new chemicals are hurting the endangered native oysters", in which case this answer choice does the opposite of what would be useful to us.

  5. Irrelevant Distinction9% picked this

    TBT is more deadly to oysters in colder waters than in

    Given that there isn't TBT in the water anymore (basically), it doesn't matter where TBT is more deadly. It's not present, so it's not the current reason why native oyster populations are struggling.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free