Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT155 S3 P2 Q15 ExplanationILC's Draft Articles

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

With rapidly expanding populations, growing industrial development, and dwindling water supplies on national and regional levels, water is fast replacing oil as the world’s most valuable resource. Meanwhile, the growing importance of water in geopolitical affairs has increased the potential for international conflict over water resources. Thus as development and other threats Nations’ International Law Commission (ILC) to develop a treaty structure for the uses of international watercourses.

The ILC’s Draft Articles on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses are an attempt to codify the customary principles of international water law as those principles are manifested in past legal decisions and currently accepted international practice. The Draft Articles are intended as a set of guidelines for the watercourse should be equitable and reasonable, and that nations should work for the protection of ecosystems.

Though the Draft Articles are a significant step forward in the formulation of legal principles for the protection and regulation of international rivers, they are inadequate because they do not provide satisfactory ways of dealing with possible future environmental changes. One significant environmental threat to the world’s rivers is the increase of from increased runoff due to snowmelt or, more importantly, from decreased precipitation in many regions.

Treaties that allocate fixed amounts of water to various countries based on current usage, as suggested by the Draft Articles, will not be flexible enough to respond to these large fluctuations in river flows. Once specific water rights are allocated along a river in accordance with the Draft Articles, nations would have climate changes, such as how reduced flows will be allocated among the countries sharing a river.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

The author probably intends the phrase “treaty structure” in the last sentence of the first paragraph

Answer choices, explained

  1. Unsupported: international accord15% picked this

    an outline for a comprehensive international accord intended to serve in place of individual bilateral

    This is playing off the conversational understanding of "treaty", which is usually an agreement between countries. But the treaty structure the ILC is developing is just its own paper, codifying how international watercourse law should go down. It doesn't specify that countries should band together and create one big international accord vs. making bilateral treaties (treaties between two countries). It just suggests a few broad principles that should be followed whenever treaties are being created (whether the treaty is between 2, 3, or more countries).

  2. Unsupported: compendium of treaties3% picked this

    a compendium of past treaties that the ILC regards as exemplary models for the formulation

    This treaty structure is supposedly bundling together the wisdom of past legal precedents and currently accepted international practice, but it doesn't say anything about bundling together past treaties.

  3. Unsupported5% picked this

    a systematic analysis of legal precedents that have been established by international tribunals in

    Unsupported: systematic analysis Out of Scope: tribunals We're told that the treaty structure is an attempt to codify the principles of past legal decisions, but that's a high level idea -- present some bullet points that try to distill the spirit of past decisions. That's not at all the same as a thorough, systematic analysis. There also isn't any mention of "international tribunals".

  4. Correct76% picked this

    a set of general prescriptive principles to be followed in the formulation of the

    Why this is right

    The second sentence of the 2nd paragraph, says that the Draft Articles are "intended as a set of guidelines for the creation of treaties" (a set of general prescriptive principles) "They prescribe that treaties should uphold several broad precepts" = (to be followed in the formulation of the provisions of treaties) The question stem pointed us to "treaty structure" at the end of the first paragraph. The test wanted to see if we knew that this was referring to Draft Articles in the following sentence. The correct answer pulled a detail about Draft Articles from the sentence after that. It's a good reminder that "where they point us is near to, but usually is not actually, the lines that they're testing".

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: advisory board1% picked this

    a charter for a proposed advisory board that would oversee treaty negotiation on behalf of

    There isn't any proposed advisory board mentioned. This treaty structure is just codifying some good principles to follow for countries that are going to make water treaties.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free