Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT155 S2 Q25 Explanation

Art critic: An arrangement

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Art critic: An arrangement of objects tends to be aesthetically pleasing to the extent that it gives the impression that the person who arranged the objects she was attempting to do.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

The generalization expressed by the art critic, if correct, most helps to justify the reasoning in which one

Answer choices

  1. Weak Match6% picked this

    The new art installation is very pleasing aesthetically. However, even though it is not apparent to viewers, the artist did not intend the wooden

    The viewers don't realize that the arranger didn't accomplish their goal, but this principle needs the viewers to know that the arranger did accomplish their goal. Otherwise we shouldn't be labeling it very aesthetically pleasing.

  2. Weak Match16% picked this

    The wooden panels in the art installation probably are not arranged in the way that the artist wanted them arranged, for the installation is

    I don't hate this one, but the Conclusion / Premise should probably be swapped. We would use the criterion of "this arrangement gives the clear impression that the arranger succeeded at their intent, thus aesthetically pleasing". But maybe more importantly is that this talks about whether or not the artist succeeded, whereas what we need to hear about is whether the arrangement "gives the impression" that the artist succeeded.

  3. Out of Scope: symmetrical7% picked this

    The arrangement of wooden panels in the art installation is likely to give the impression that the artist who arranged them did not quite

    This clarifies whether or not the impression of success was given off, but this doesn't have anything about how aesthetically pleasing the art is / isn't.

  4. Correct65% picked this

    The art installation would be more aesthetically pleasing if the wooden panels in it were arranged more symmetrically, for then it would seem more

    Why this is right

    This clearly connects the idea of "giving off the impression of successful attempt" with "more aesthetically pleasing".

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Opposite5% picked this

    The artist could make the arrangement of wooden panels in the art installation more aesthetically pleasing by making it less symmetrical, for then it

    This is saying "by making this look less fully planned (less intentional / less like a successful execution of the arranger's vision)", it will be "more aesthetically pleasing". That has the principle backwards.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free