Fat tissue depends on angiogenesis in order
Why this is right
This reinforces our prediction that "inhibiting angiogenesis prevents obesity in rats". Now, are there problems with this correct answer? Oh my heavens, yes. 1. depends is very strong However, we were told that tumors need these blood vessels to be created and that this drug prevents cancer from spreading by denying them their needed blood vessels. Since we're saying the same drug (that inhibits angiogenesis) works to prevent obesity, it's reasonable to think that fat cells also need / depend on blood vessels. 2. Fat tissue? Where did that come from? Well, naturally it relates to obesity, but it sounds overly specific. It also might concern people that they're using outside knowledge when it comes to connecting obesity with fat tissue. You're allowed to use common sense knowledge. If you asked 10 people on the street whether obesity was connected to fat, they'd probably all say yes. Is is common sense that obesity involves the growth of fat tissue? Hmm, pretty close. I think idiots like me wouldn't have ever defined obesity that way, because we're not smart enough about biology to think to use the term fat tissue, but if you asked me if someone who was becoming obese or more obese was gaining fat tissue, I would say, "yeah, right?" 3. Isn't this too broad? We only should be able to say "fat tissue in rodents depends on angiogenesis". Sure, we were only told about rodents, but it's common sense that lots of testing of products and medicines happens on rodents before it's used on humans, since rodents are also mammals and our physiology is apparently similar enough that what we learn from testing rodents usually ports over pretty well to humans too. (Guinea pigs are rodents, and we probably all know the expression of "I don't want to be the guinea pig" means "I don't want to be the test subject") 4. Jeez, Patrick, if you have to itemize multiple possible qualms and then kinda make peace with each one, doesn't that add up to a pretty poorly supported answer? Yes, kind of. But is there a more supported answer? This question stem tolerates fuzzy support, if no other answer has clearer support.
Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.