Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT155 S1 Q15 ExplanationMost cats like to go outside

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most cats like to go outside to play when the temperature is above freezing. However, Jamil does not allow his cat to go outside unless at least one member of his family is outside, and Jamil's family is shining or it is hot outside.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Bad Trigger / Outcome Match5% picked this

    If Jamil's cat is outside, then the temperature is

    We don't have any knowledge triggered by "If J's cat is outside". We know that "If J's cat is allowed outside, then some family members are out there, which means it's sunny, hot, or both." Cat some family sun's shining allowed → members → or outside are outside hot outside But the cat might be outside without being allowed outside. And even if we played along and equated those, we just know that it's sunny, hot, or both. We can't prove that the temperature is above freezing. The sun can be shining, even when the temperature is freezing or colder.

  2. Illegal Negation3% picked this

    If Jamil's cat is not outside, it is cloudy and it is

    We don't have any knowledge triggered by "If J's cat is not outside". We know that "If J's cat is allowed outside, then some family members are out there, which means it's sunny, hot, or both." Cat some family sun's shining allowed → members → or outside are outside hot outside This answer is trying to flip the lightswitch on all these ideas, which is illegal. It's thinking, Cat not no family sun's not shine allowed → members → or outside are outside not hot outside

  3. Illegal Reversal7% picked this

    If the sun is shining or it is hot outside, Jamil's cat

    We don't have any knowledge triggered by "If sun is shining or hot outside". That's an outcome, not a trigger. Cat some family sun's shining allowed → members → or outside are outside hot outside This answer is trying to read backwards, which is illegal. It's thinking, Cat some family sun's shining allowed ← members ← or outside are outside hot outside

  4. Illegal Reversal7% picked this

    If at least one member of Jamil's family is outside, then Jamil's cat

    We do have some knowledge triggered by "If some family members are outside". That tells us that it's sunny, hot, or both. Cat some family sun's shining allowed → members → or outside are outside hot outside This answer is trying to read backwards, which is illegal. It's thinking, Cat some family sun's shining allowed ← members ← or outside are outside hot outside

  5. Correct77% picked this

    If the sun is not shining and it is not hot outside, Jamil's cat

    Why this is right

    This provides the contrapositive of the chain we derived. Cat some family sun's shining allowed → members → or outside are outside hot outside When we contrapose A → B → C or D we get ~D and ~C → ~B → ~A So the contrapositive of our chain is ~sun shining no fam cat not and → members → allowed ~hot outside outside outside That's what this answer is reflecting, "If this 1st thing, then this 3rd thing". The answer does add on an assumption that "if the cat is not allowed outside, then the cat is not outside". That is definitely not something we were told, and it's not a common sense truth that "whenever cats aren't allowed outside, they are not outside", because we all know cats escape sometimes. So this serves as a nice reminder that the "best" answer on a must be true might not literally be 100% derivable, but it will always be the most supportable option.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free