Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT155 S4 Q19 Explanation

McKee: Heckling the performer

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

McKee: Heckling the performer is a long-standing tradition of stand-up comedy. The performers know this and learn to respond entertainingly. That’s why it’s unwise prevent audience members from heckling.

Chapman: Heckling is only a long-standing tradition of comedy because it’s tolerated. And it’s usually only fun for the heckler. In most cases, distraction from the performance.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

McKee’s and Chapman’s statements indicate that they disagree about each of the

Answer choices

  1. Disagree8% picked this

    Comedy venues should tolerate audience members’ heckling

    We don't have explicit disagreement from Chapman, but on this question, we're going off a standard of "most supportable". McKee thinks clubs should not try to prevent heckling (i.e. they should tolerate it). Chapman would potentially say they should not tolerate it, because it's mostly a distraction from the performance.

  2. Disagree9% picked this

    Stand-up comedians’ responses to heckling should be considered part of their

    There is only contextual support for either party's take on this, but it seems to speak to the thrust of their disagreement. McKee thinks that heckling is a time honored tradition; comics are ready for it and use to entertain the audience. Why, it's practically part of the show! Chapman is saying, "No, comics are aware it might happen, but they don't want it to happen. They tolerate it and try to humorously deflect, but it's usually just fun for the heckler and distracting for everyone else".

  3. Correct61% picked this

    The best stand-up comedians are able to respond entertainingly when they are heckled

    Why this is right

    Neither author makes it seem like being able to handle hecklers well is a trait of the best comedians, but it's fair to think that McKee would agree with this. Since he thinks that dealing entertainingly with hecklers is part of the job of being a comedian, he would think that someone good at the job would be able to entertainingly deal with hecklers. But Chapman would potentially agree with this. There isn't any support for Chapman saying that "great stand-ups are unable to respond entertainingly to a heckler". Chapman is acting like, "Sure, maybe they still get a laugh from dealing with the heckler, but they don't want to be dealing with the heckler."

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Disagree13% picked this

    Many audience members at comedy venues enjoy watching stand-up comedians respond

    This gets to the issue of McKee saying "it's part of the tradition; the performers respond entertainingly (the crowd enjoys). Comedy clubs should allow it." Meanwhile, Chapman is saying "it's tolerated, not enjoyed. It's a distraction from the performance", and most relevantly, "it's usually only fun for the heckler". Technically, Chapman's statements leave plenty of room for him to agree with this answer choice, but when we're comparing our five options, this at least has some support for disagreement, whereas the correct answer (C) had no support for disagreement.

  5. Disagree9% picked this

    It is unwise for comedy venues to disregard longstanding traditions of

    This is really a copy of (A) -- whether clubs should / shouldn't tolerate heckling. M would agree with this answer. He thinks heckling is a longstanding tradition and it would be unwise for clubs to suddenly ban/disregard this tradition. Meanwhile, Chapman thinks heckling is mostly a distraction enjoyed only by the heckler, so he would be fine with comedy clubs disregarding this longstanding tradition. This is another answer choice that has pretty weak disagreement support. I would never expect this to be a correct answer on a normal Disagree question, but it's more supportable that they disagree on this than that they disagree about (C).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free