Logical Reasoning

PT155 · S1 · Q11 Science writer: Studies indicate that North Americans

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Science writer: Studies indicate that North Americans are becoming more lethargic.

Conclusion (Thus)

The lethargy studies do not settle the question of whether fast food is unhealthy.

Evidence

Studies show North Americans are getting more lethargic, and from 1970 to 1990, North Americans had a 7x increase in fast food consumption.

(implied) But that correlation doesn't prove causality. Here's an alternate explanation for why lethargy has been growing: lack of exercise.

Few lethargic adults do much exercise, and lack of exercise can contribute to lethargy.

Evaluate

Over 85% of Main Conclusion and Role questions try to hide the conclusion by making it the very First Sentence, or by attaching it to some Pivot / Rebuttal.

The first sentence presents as a fact, not an opinion, so it doesn't seem like the Conclusion is our first sentence. The second sentence begins with an Attribution, "One researcher has concluded X".

We anticipate that our author will be resisting this conclusion. Waiting for that But / Yet / However pivot ... we get it with the second to last sentence.

But / Yet / However's are what we call the Author's Pivot. They indicate that we're pivoting to the author's argument.

The author might say But [conclusion]. After all, [premise]. Or the author might say But [premise]. Therefore, [conclusion].

In this case, we see Thus introduces the final claim, so that last claim is our Conclusion.

Goal

Once we've correctly located the Conclusion, we often want to rephrase it. If there are any pronouns, we import the idea they refer to. We try to think of a synonymous way of saying the same claim, because correct answers frequently go for a meaning-match, not a word-match.

The author is saying the lethargy studies don't settle the question of whether fast food is unhealthy. That could be rephrased as,

Let's look for the answer that best matches the meaning of the final sentence.

11.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the science writer's argument?

  1. A lack of regular exercise

    Unstated Assumption / Implication

    Since this was never actually said, it can't be the answer. The author is indeed implying that a lack of regular exercise could be a cause / the cause of the increase in lethargy. But that's not what the last sentence says. The last sentence is about the lethargy studies.

    2% picked this

  2. High consumption of fast food

    Unstated

    This is unstated and doesn't resemble the final sentence, which is our Conclusion.

    1% picked this

  3. The researcher's data show that

    Unstated

    This is unstated and doesn't resemble the final sentence, which is our Conclusion.

    3% picked this

  4. The lethargy studies failed to

    Unstated Implication

    The last sentence is saying that the lethargy studies don't settle an issue. This is saying the lethargy studies overlooked a cause. Yes, the author would agree with this answer choice, but it doesn't match the meaning of the final sentence. And it is totally designed to fish us in with Word-Bait, because it starts off just like the "Thus" claim does.

    15% picked this

  5. Correct

    The researcher's conclusion was not

    Why this is right

    This is ultimately just a Rebuttal conclusion. The researcher concluded that "fast-food is unhealthy" based on the lethargy study. Our author's However is implicitly saying, "You shouldn't conclude fast-food is unhealthy based on the lethargy study. The lethargy study doesn't settle the question of whether fast food is unhealthy. It doesn't prove that fast food is bad." (because there could be an alternate, exercise-related explanation for the increase in lethargy)

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free