Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT155 S3 P3 Q22 Explanation

Nanoscale Computer Chips

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsStrengthenScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

This passage was adapted from an article published

Competition to make computer chips smaller and, consequently, faster and more efficient has driven a technological revolution, fueled economic growth, and rapidly made successive generations of computers obsolete. Yet at the current rate of progress this march toward miniaturization will hit a wall by about 2010—for many, an unthinkable prospect. The laws are investigating a different molecular pattern maker: peptides, amino acid chains that are shorter than proteins.

The project grew out of Belcher’s doctoral research on abalone. Her research group discovered in the mid-1990s that a specific peptide causes calcium carbonate to crystallize into the structure found only in the tough abalone shell. From that discovery, Belcher and Hu, Belcher’s postdoctoral adviser at the time, realized that if they resembling accelerated evolution, they developed additional related peptides from those that had the initially promising characteristics.

Hu says that in order to use such a method to assemble a set of circuit-building tools it would be necessary to identify many additional organic compounds that bind to circuit-component materials. The group is making progress on that quest. As they have expanded their targets to 20 more semiconductor materials, their glue. It will take that kind of finesse at the nanoscale to produce selfassembling circuits.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Topic

The author is profiling a piece of chemistry research aimed at solving a problem the computer industry is about to run into.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't fighting an opponent — they're explaining why this research matters and where it stands.

Main Point

Here's the simpler version: computer chips have been getting smaller every year, but that march is about to hit a physical wall — transistors can't shrink below 25 nanometers using current techniques. Living cells, though, build smaller structures all the time. So scientists are looking to biology for tools. Belcher and Hu are betting on peptides (short amino-acid chains): they've found peptides that can grab onto specific semiconductor crystals and even act like molecular glue. That's the kind of fine-grained tool you'd need to build circuits that assemble themselves at the nanoscale.

P1: A wall is coming, and biology might help

Chips have been getting smaller, faster, cheaper — but at the current rate, this hits a wall by about 2010. The laws of physics say current transistors can't go below 25 nanometers. Cells, however, build complex structures smaller than that all the time. So the question is whether we can harness those biological processes. Most researchers focus on DNA. Belcher and Hu are working with peptides instead.

P2: How the idea developed

Belcher had been studying abalone shells and found a peptide that controls how calcium carbonate crystallizes there. She and Hu reasoned: if we can find peptides that control crystal growth in semiconductor materials, we'd have a tool for building tiny electronics. No such peptide was known, so they took the bold approach of growing a billion random peptides and testing which ones grabbed onto silicon, gallium arsenide, or indium phosphide crystals. They found a handful, and then refined them by a process resembling evolution.

P3: Where the project is now

To make a real toolkit they'd need many more binding peptides. They're getting there — hundreds of them, across 20+ materials. They're also designing peptides that latch onto two different crystals at once, which acts like a tiny dab of glue. That kind of precision is what circuits that build themselves will need.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to a prediction of an eventual commercial application of Belcher and Hu’s research

Answer choices

  1. Opposite, if anything34% picked this

    Belcher and Hu’s early successes in synthesizing peptides that bind to semiconductors have sparked renewed interest in possible DNA applications

    DNA-based circuits are essentially a competitor for peptide-based circuits, so sparking renewed interest in DNA technology does not strengthen the idea that peptide technology will have commercial applications.

  2. Correct46% picked this

    For almost any semiconductor material that is used in a computer circuit, there are many other semiconductor materials that function in the same way

    Why this is right

    This is a super confusing answer, but it's at least somewhat attractive because it's a very strong answer, so it has the potential to be impactful. It actually ties back to that sentence at the beginning of the final paragraph where we're told was the success of this whole peptide enterprise hinges on: In order to use such a method to assemble a set of circuit-building tools (i.e. an eventual commercial application), it would be necessary to identify many additional organic compounds that bind to circuit-component materials (i.e. semiconductor materials). This answer is saying that for almost any semiconductor material used in a circuit, there are a lot of other equally good options. So if we can't identify an organic compound that binds to "silicon, gallium arsenide, or indium phosphide crystals", this answer is saying we could swap out any of those materials and use a different material instead, one which me might have more luck with in terms of finding an organic compound that binds to it. In essence, this answer is just saying, "When it comes to solving the crucial problem of finding organic compounds that can bind to circuit-component materials, we have LOTS of options for circuit-component materials", which increases the odds that we'll be able to find an organic compound that binds to at least one of them.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weakens, if anything9% picked this

    The number of peptides that bind to two different crystals at once appears to be smaller than the number of peptides that, although they

    It's a great thing when a peptide can bind to two different crystals at once. That gives us a lot of flexibility --- "it will take that kind of finesse at the nanoscale to produce selfassembling circuits". But this answer is saying there aren't that many of those peptides. That would seem to threaten the commercial viability of this technique. If there aren't many peptides that can act like a daub of glue to bind two different crystals at once, then we might not have all the options we need to build a selfassembling circuit.

  4. No Impact7% picked this

    The one billion peptides that Belcher and Hu grew and tested in the initial stages of their research was nearly four times the number

    This doesn't seem to speak to anything that seems particularly encouraging when it comes to commercial viability. Initially, they made about 1 billion peptides. Once they had found some peptides that worked, they tried to make slight variations on those, and this is telling us that there were about 250 million of those. Okay?

  5. Weakens4% picked this

    Expectations of continuing high costs of synthesizing the peptides that Belcher and Hu have found to bind to semiconductors have tended to restrict the

    This undermines the hope that peptide circuits will be commercially viable. There are high costs involved in trying to find the right peptides and it's discouraging the number of scientists even willing to try.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free