Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT155 S3 P3 Q17 Explanation

Nanoscale Computer Chips

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

This passage was adapted from an article published

Competition to make computer chips smaller and, consequently, faster and more efficient has driven a technological revolution, fueled economic growth, and rapidly made successive generations of computers obsolete. Yet at the current rate of progress this march toward miniaturization will hit a wall by about 2010—for many, an unthinkable prospect. The laws are investigating a different molecular pattern maker: peptides, amino acid chains that are shorter than proteins.

The project grew out of Belcher’s doctoral research on abalone. Her research group discovered in the mid-1990s that a specific peptide causes calcium carbonate to crystallize into the structure found only in the tough abalone shell. From that discovery, Belcher and Hu, Belcher’s postdoctoral adviser at the time, realized that if they resembling accelerated evolution, they developed additional related peptides from those that had the initially promising characteristics.

Hu says that in order to use such a method to assemble a set of circuit-building tools it would be necessary to identify many additional organic compounds that bind to circuit-component materials. The group is making progress on that quest. As they have expanded their targets to 20 more semiconductor materials, their glue. It will take that kind of finesse at the nanoscale to produce selfassembling circuits.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Topic

The author is profiling a piece of chemistry research aimed at solving a problem the computer industry is about to run into.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't fighting an opponent — they're explaining why this research matters and where it stands.

Main Point

Here's the simpler version: computer chips have been getting smaller every year, but that march is about to hit a physical wall — transistors can't shrink below 25 nanometers using current techniques. Living cells, though, build smaller structures all the time. So scientists are looking to biology for tools. Belcher and Hu are betting on peptides (short amino-acid chains): they've found peptides that can grab onto specific semiconductor crystals and even act like molecular glue. That's the kind of fine-grained tool you'd need to build circuits that assemble themselves at the nanoscale.

P1: A wall is coming, and biology might help

Chips have been getting smaller, faster, cheaper — but at the current rate, this hits a wall by about 2010. The laws of physics say current transistors can't go below 25 nanometers. Cells, however, build complex structures smaller than that all the time. So the question is whether we can harness those biological processes. Most researchers focus on DNA. Belcher and Hu are working with peptides instead.

P2: How the idea developed

Belcher had been studying abalone shells and found a peptide that controls how calcium carbonate crystallizes there. She and Hu reasoned: if we can find peptides that control crystal growth in semiconductor materials, we'd have a tool for building tiny electronics. No such peptide was known, so they took the bold approach of growing a billion random peptides and testing which ones grabbed onto silicon, gallium arsenide, or indium phosphide crystals. They found a handful, and then refined them by a process resembling evolution.

P3: Where the project is now

To make a real toolkit they'd need many more binding peptides. They're getting there — hundreds of them, across 20+ materials. They're also designing peptides that latch onto two different crystals at once, which acts like a tiny dab of glue. That kind of precision is what circuits that build themselves will need.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The words “that kind of finesse” (final sentence of the passage) refer

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match2% picked this

    the ability to translate abstract, theoretical concepts in computer design into

    "That kind of finesse" is about glueing together two crystals with a peptide. This is talking about translating concepts into concrete applications.

  2. Bad Match6% picked this

    the creativity that was necessary to apply knowledge gained from DNA research to molecular pattern

    "That kind of finesse" is about the fine-grained precision it would take to glue together two crystals with a peptide. This is talking about the creativity / insight someone had to apply DNA knowledge to other molecular pattern makers.

  3. Weak Match8% picked this

    the development of sophisticated methods of observing the behavior of crystalline structures that are both extremely

    "That kind of finesse" is about the fine-grained precision it would take to glue together two crystals with a peptide. Does that involve developing sophisticated methods of observing these crystals that are both tiny (nanoscopic) and complex? Kind of. We could keep this on a first pass since it's close to the task being described than (A) and (B) were, but this is talking primarily about observing the semiconductor crystals. It doesn't seem to really be talking glueing them together with peptides. Also, did we ever hear that semiconductor crystals are "extremely complex" structures? It seems like this is stealing wording from the 1st paragraph: in living cells, natural chemical processes efficiently and precisely produce extremely complex structures The fact that this answer is stealing language from a completely inappropriate part of the passage lets us know this is almost surely wrong.

  4. Weak Match5% picked this

    the ability to differentiate peptides that interact chemically with at least one semiconductor material from very similar peptides that do not

    "That kind of finesse" is about the fine-grained precision it would take to glue together two crystals with a peptide. This is talking about the experiments conducted (pun intended) in the 2nd paragraph to see which peptides would bind with semiconductor materials. The "finesse" is about using some electron microscope to gently nudge a microscopic peptide into place so that it binds the correct face of two semiconductor crystals, thereby glueing them together.

  5. Correct78% picked this

    the ability of researchers to manipulate organic compounds in ways that satisfy very

    Why this is right

    Correct "That kind of finesse" is about the fine-grained precision it would take to glue together two crystals with a peptide. This is talking about manipulating an organic compound (a peptide) in a way that satisfies very specific circuit-construction needs (I need this crystal to be glued to that crystal).

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free