Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT155 S1 Q7 ExplanationTransportation official: I reject the claim

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Transportation official: I reject the claim that the ruts in our city's roads are caused by large trucks rather than studded snow tires. There are many places that have as much large truck traffic as we have here and also have a comparable amount of snowfall, and only those few places that similar to ours. Clearly, studded snow tires are to blame.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the transportation

Answer choices, explained

  1. No Impact8% picked this

    Large trucks are not allowed to have studded snow tires in

    We don't car if other areas do or don't allow large trucks to have studded tires. We care about the ruts in the road in this area. Are they caused by studded tires, large trucks, or something else? This answer doesn't help us assess the causal mystery at all.

  2. Weakens2% picked this

    The number of ruts in the roads of the transportation official's city has declined recently as the amount of

    This supports the plausibility of the Alternate Explanation that trucks are causing the ruts. If a decrease in trucks is followed by a decrease in ruts, it looks like trucks are causing the ruts.

  3. Correct88% picked this

    Most of the places that allow studded snow tires but have negligible large truck traffic have roads full of ruts similar to

    Why this is right

    These data points are even better than the ones the author already presented. In these other cities, studded tires are present / trucks are absent, and the ruts are there. That increases the plausibility that the ruts are connected to studded tires, and also decreases the plausibility that the ruts are connected to trucks. This basically supports the author's explanation and also undermines the alternate explanation.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Weak: some Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    Some cities with even more truck traffic than in the transportation official's city also have

    Answers with weak language like "some" are almost always wrong on Strengthen, Weaken, Paradox, and Sufficient Assumption. Plus, this answer would just be weakening, since it's strengthening a connection between trucks and ruts, which is the Alternate Explanation, not the author's.

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    Most places that have little snowfall do not allow the use of

    This answer about places where they don't have studded snow tires would only be relevant to us if we were told whether or not those places have ruts in the roads. If places that don't allow studded tires don't have ruts, then that would be a No Cause, No Effect strengthener. But we don't hear about whether these areas do or don't have ruts, so this answer has no value to us.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free