Reading Comprehension

PT155 · S3 · P4 · Q25 Language & Thought

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A In 1940, Benjamin Lee Whorf seduced a whole generation into believing that our mother tongue restricts what we are able to think.

Topic

How language influences thought—specifically, the relationship between language and conceptual understanding (e.g., perception, gender, numbers).

Framework

Present Debate (both passages present evidence and arguments about how language impacts cognition, engaging with Whorfian and non-Whorfian perspectives)

Main Point

While early claims suggested that language restricts what we can think (Whorfian hypothesis), more recent evidence shows that language shapes, but does not entirely determine, how we perceive and categorize the world—especially in terms of objects’ gender (Passage A) and understanding of numbers (Passage B). - The Most Valuable Sentence for Passage A: End of P2: - The Most Valuable Sentence for Passage B: End of P2:

P1 (Passage A): The Origins and Issues with Whorf's Hypothesis

Whorf claimed that our language limits our thoughts and that speakers of different languages inhabit different realities, but later it turned out there was no strong evidence for this.

P2 (Passage A): Rethinking the Influence of Language

Today, research suggests that language doesn’t prevent certain thoughts, but rather forces us to pay attention to specific things, like gender distinctions in German.

P3 (Passage A): Language Shapes Associations and Perceptions

Grammatical gender can influence our sense of what objects are like: studies showed that German and Spanish speakers attribute different qualities to objects based on whether those objects are masculine or feminine in their language.

25.

Which one of the following is true about the relationship between the two passages?

  1. Passage A presents examples of

    Wrong 1st Half

    The examples of languages in passage A are German and Spanish, which are not picturing reality in compatible ways. German language thinks that a bridge is feminine, whereas Spanish language thinks it's masculine, for example.

    4% picked this

  2. Passage A depicts language as

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: grammatical structure Passage A has grammar Both authors are talking about language influencing thought by means of vocabulary, not structure. If we count feminizing or masculinizing nouns as grammatical, then we could say that Passage A deals with grammatical structure. But that's still more like conjugation of a noun, not the grammatical structure of a sentence. And this answer is saying that grammatical concerns only showed up in Passage B, when what we're talking about right now comes from Passage A.

    7% picked this

  3. Passage A regards linguistic differences

    Too Strong: impossible

    Passage A is never saying anything as strong as "mutual understanding is impossible". Given that the author of Passage A thinks that the influence of language on thought has been oversold, he would probably think that people of any language could get to some mutual understanding. Their mother tongue wouldn't prevent them from being able to think certain thoughts.

    3% picked this

  4. Passage A portrays linguistic differences

    Wrong 1st Half

    Passage A is never saying that different concepts lead to differences in language. It says the reverse: differences in grammatical genders for such nouns as clocks, violins, and bridges lead to conceptual differences in the minds of German and Spanish speakers.

    22% picked this

  5. Correct

    Passage A focuses on differences

    Why this is right

    Passage A's discussion about male / female nouns in German and Spanish is focused on how people, because of their language, have different associations with bridges, violins, clocks, etc. Passage B's discussion about numerate / non-numerate languages is focused on whether or not people possess the concept of exact equality, or the number 3, for example.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    64% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free