Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT155 S2 Q3 ExplanationBiologist: DNA analysis show

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Biologist: DNA analysis shows that Acacia heterophylla, a tree native to the Indian Ocean’s Réunion Island, is descended from the Hawaiian tree Acacia koa. Some think this occurred because A. koa seeds floated from Hawaii to Réunion, but that explanation is implausible, since the seeds will not germinate after being soaked in Seabirds sometimes carry seeds great distances, so they probably caused the dispersal.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the support for

Answer choices, explained

  1. Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    A. koa branches carrying seeds can remain afloat for prolonged periods

    We would either say this does nothing to add plausibility to the seabird hypothesis, or we might even say that this strengthens the Alternate Hypothesis that the seeds could have potentially floated from Hawaii to Reunion. The author rejected it on the basis that, "If the seeds got wet, they wouldn't be able to grow on Reunion", but this answer is making it sound like maybe the seeds could make it there without getting wet? Maybe the tree branch could stay afloat long enough that some of the seeds would stay dry?

  2. Correct97% picked this

    There are mountain-nesting seabird species common to Réunion

    Why this is right

    This adds plausibility to the seabird hypothesis by telling us that there are bird species who live in both Reunion and Hawaii (thus, there might be a migratory pathway that seabirds take from one place to the other). When this biologist first says her hypothesis, "Maybe seabirds took the seeds from Hawaii to Reunion?", we can imagine a skeptic saying, "Bah! Are there even birds that can make that trip? Do seabirds ever fly from Hawaii to Reunion?" This answer is providing a clue that makes it sound like maybe there are seabird species making the trek back and forth.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact1% picked this

    A. koa is thought to be descended from Acacia melanoxylon, a tree native

    This does nothing to increase the plausibility of the hypothesis that seabirds took seeds of A. koa from Hawaii to Reunion. This is just telling us an origin story for A. koa, which doesn't have any bearing on our conversation.

  4. Weakens, if anything0% picked this

    Ocean currents have sometimes carried buoyant objects from Hawaii

    This answer seems to support the Alternate Hypothesis that seeds floated from Hawaii to Reunion, because it's establishing the possibility of something floating from Hawaii to Reunion. This doesn't do anything to make us think that seabirds carried the seeds from Hawaii to Reunion.

  5. Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    Many seabird species return to land very infrequently, and often do so

    This seems to somewhat hurt the hypothesis that seabirds took seeds from Hawaii to Reunion, because that would be a land-to-land trip, and this answer is saying that many seabird species very rarely return to land.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free