Skills are acquired only if they
Why this is right
We want to prove that this hypothetical being will not acquire the skill of discovering means to ends. This answer says a hypothetical being will not acquire a skill if the skill isn't needed. Did the argument say whether this hypothetical being would need the skill of discovering means to ends? It did not explicitly, but we're allowed to use our common sense here. The idea of "means to an ends" is the idea of "I want X (that's the end). How do I get X? (what's the means of getting it)" We normal people think, "I want a Tesla. How do I go about getting a Tesla" and in trying to figure out a way, we are discovering the means to an end. This hypothetical being says, "I want a Tesla", and a Tesla immediately appears. So she has no need to develop the ability of discovering the means to an end. She's got instant gratification for any end she desires. Since she has no need to discover how to get what she wants (she always and instantly gets what she wants), according to this answer she will never acquire the skill of being able discover how to get what she wants. Someone who is always instantly gratified never needs the ability to discover means to ends. So according to this answer, they will never acquire the ability to discover means to ends. So according to the first sentence, they will never have practical intelligence. Thus, we proved the conclusion.
Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.