Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT148 S4 Q20 ExplanationAt Tromen University this semester

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

At Tromen University this semester, some students taking French Literature 205 are also taking Biology 218. Every student taking Biology 218 at Tromen is a biology major. Therefore, some Literature 205 are not French-literature majors.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed to be true

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope: required course3% picked this

    French Literature 205 is a required course for

    We don't want new ideas in Sufficient Assumption answers. We just want them to patch up the existing ideas. Learning that French Literature 205 is required for French Literature majors wouldn't help us in any way to prove that certain people aren't French Literature majors.

  2. Already Know This17% picked this

    Only biology majors are allowed to take

    It's incredibly rare that this happens, but this answer basically restates a premise. This is technically still distinct, because this is a timeless rule. The premise was about the students who are currently taking Biology 218, but conditionally they're going to look the same: Biology 218 ? Biology major

  3. Out of Scope: more5% picked this

    There are more biology majors than there are

    The total quantity of Biology vs. French Literature majors is irrelevant to us. It wouldn't make any difference if Biology had more / less / the same. This won't help us prove that some French Literature 205 students aren't French Literature majors. We already know that they're Biology majors. We just need to know if they could also be French Literature majors. There could be some students who are double majors (Biology and French Literature), whether there are more Biology, same Biology, or less Biology students overall.

  4. Out of Scope: more2% picked this

    There are more French-literature majors than there are

    The total quantity of Biology vs. French Literature majors is irrelevant to us. It wouldn't make any difference if French Literature had more / less / the same. This won't help us prove that some French Literature 205 students aren't French Literature majors. We already know that they're Biology majors. We just need to know if they could also be French Literature majors. There could be some students who are double majors (Biology and French Literature), whether there are more French Literature, same French Literature, or less French Literature students overall. So this fact doesn't help us assess the critical vulnerability of the argument: is it possible these bio majors taking French Literature 205 are also French Literature majors?

  5. Correct74% picked this

    It is not possible to major in both biology and

    Why this is right

    As we predicted, we needed to get from "we know these some students are bio majors" to "we want to prove that these some students are not French literature majors". This rule clearly justifies that move. It also matches the missing conditional link we sketched out in the setup: Biology major ? ~French literature major

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free