Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT148 S1 Q1 Explanation

In a recent study of dust-mite

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In a recent study of dust-mite allergy sufferers, one group slept on mite-proof bedding, while a control group slept on bedding that was not mite-proof. The group using mite-proof bedding had a 69 percent reduction in the dust-mite allergen in their mattresses, whereas there was no significant reduction in the control group. to dust mites, no symptom reduction was reported in either group.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in

Answer choices

  1. Irrelevant Distinction4% picked this

    Dust-mite allergens in bedding tend to irritate many allergy sufferers' nasal passages more than do the same allergens in

    A comparison between bedding and carpets does nothing for us. We're only concerned with explaining what happened with the less-allergen bedding in this study.

  2. Unclear Impact4% picked this

    When people report their own allergy symptoms, they tend to exaggerate the severity

    This is probably tempting to a lot of us, because it feels like we could say, "The reason no symptom reduction was reported is that people always exaggerate how bad their allergies are. The group that slept on the less-allergen mattress, in reality had fewer symptoms, but since allergy sufferers tend to exaggerate the severity of symptoms, they made themselves sound just as bad as the people who slept on the regular mattress." Here's the problem -- since everyone is exaggerating, that just means that everyone's reported severity of symptoms would be higher than it should be. However that doesn't mean that everyone's reported severity would be the same. Let's pretend that allergy symptoms can be ranked in severity on a 1 to 10 scale. And let's say people tend to always exaggerate the real severity of their symptoms by adding +2. So people whose symptoms really have a level 5 severity will report having level 7 symptoms. If the less-allergen mattress in the study actually helped, then the people on those mattresses would have, in reality, gone from level 5 to level 2 symptoms, though they would exaggerate and report level 4 severity. Meanwhile the people on the regular control mattresses would still be experiencing 5 and reporting 7. If the mite-proof mattress works to reduce symptoms, then that group would be reporting more symptom reduction than would the control group. Even though everyone is exaggerating, the people who are helped by the mattress would be exaggerating from a milder position (level 2 severity), so their reported severity would be lower than when they were exaggerating from their average position (level 5 severity). In short, the fact that everyone in the study (in both groups) is exaggerating doesn't explain why the two groups are reporting the same severity of symptoms (unless we make an unwarranted assumption that "exaggerating" is the same as "saying that my symptoms are at maximum severity").

  3. No Impact2% picked this

    The medical community does not fully understand how dust-mite allergens

    Their lack of understanding is not going to solve our lack of understanding as to why a 69% reduction in allergens didn't lead to any symptom reduction, for the people who slept on the special mattresses.

  4. Correct90% picked this

    For dust-mite allergy sufferers to get relief from their allergies, dust-mite allergens must be reduced by

    Why this is right

    This explains why a 69% reduction in allergens wasn't good enough to reduce symptoms. According to this answer allergens are reduced → allergy sufferers don't by less than 90% get relief We know in the experiment that the allergens were only reduced 69%, which is less than 90%, so thus those people wouldn't get any relief, and thus neither group reported any reduction in symptoms.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. No Impact2% picked this

    All of the participants in the study were told that one group in the study would be

    This is telling people at the start of an experiment, "One group is the variable group. One is the control group." That's just the basic setup of every experiment. People don't know whether they're in the variable or control group, so that has no effect on anything.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free