Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT148 S2 P4 Q26 Explanation

Brain Scans

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

There are some basic conceptual problems hovering about the widespread use of brain scans as pictures of mental activity. As applied to medical diagnosis (for example, in diagnosing a brain tumor), a brain scan is similar in principle to an X-ray: it is a way of seeing inside the body. Its value are instantiated in localized brain regions. This premise is known as the modular theory of mind.

It may in fact be that neither mental activity, nor the physical processes that constitute it, are decomposable into independent modules. Psychologist William Uttal contends that rather than distinct entities, the various mental processes are likely to be properties of a more general mental activity that is distributed throughout the brain. It so for a reason. To cleanly separate emotion from reason-giving makes a hash of human experience.

But if this critique of the modular theory of mind is valid, how can one account for the fact that brain scans do, in fact, reveal well-defined areas that “light up” in response to various cognitive tasks? In the case of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), what you are seeing when you remains after the subtraction represents the metabolic activity associated solely with the cognitive task in question.

One immediately obvious (but usually unremarked) problem is that this method obscures the fact that the entire brain is active in both conditions. A false impression of neat functional localization is given by differential brain scans that subtract out all the distributed brain functions. This subtractive method produces striking images of the it is illustrated so well by the products of the subtractive method?

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: most Goes Against Passage2% picked this

    Although there are important exceptions, most cognition does in fact depend on independent modules located in specific

    The passage doesn't give us the means to quantity that at least 51% of cognition depends on independent modules located in specific regions of the brain. And since the author is a skeptic when it comes to the modular theory of the mind, this also seems to go against the gist of the author's tone.

  2. Too Strong: close to zero7% picked this

    The modular theory of mind holds that regions of the brain that are not engaged in a specific cognitive task have a rate of

    The modular theory doesn't think that inactive brain regions have an oxygen rate that is close to zero. It thinks that inactive regions have an oxygen rate that is close to its baseline. The fMRI starts by taking a baseline measurement of oxygen use. Let's say Region 1 and Region 2 are each using about 10 units of oxygen per second. Then we scan the brain while a patient is doing activity X. If Region 1 is still using 10 units and Region 2 is now using 15 units, we'll say that Region 2 is involved in activity X, whereas Region 1 is not. Since the fMRI shows the differential between the baseline measurement and the engaged in activity measurement, it would show these two values: Region 1: 0 units, Region 2: +5 units But while the differential for the unengaged region is close to zero, that doesn't mean they think the region itself is close to zero. They know it's still at its 10 units / second baseline measurement.

  3. Correct61% picked this

    During the performance of certain cognitive tasks, the areas of the brain that are most metabolically active show a rate of oxygen use that

    Why this is right

    This is essentially saying a necessary assumption of the subtractive method. Since the subtractive method is subtracting the baseline activity levels from the activity levels measured during Task X, it would have to be the case that the activity levels measured during Task X are higher than the baseline levels. If Task X involves a big uptick of activity in regions 2 and 5, an fMRI would look something like this. Baseline During Task X Differential R1 10 10 0 R2 10 16 +6 R3 10 10 0 R4 10 10 0 R5 10 18 +8 This answer is saying that in that 2nd column, the active regions will have a metabolic number that is higher than the numbers of the rest of the brain. The baseline number is sort of like "the minimum" metabolic activity for each region. When regions are more active, they surge above that number.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: all times14% picked this

    The baseline measurements of oxygen use taken for use in the subtractive method show that some regions of the brain have high

    We don't know whether this extreme claim is true, whether any region of the brain has high activity all the time.

  5. Too Strong: conditional16% picked this

    When a brain scan subject experiences anger, the subtractive method shows several regions of the brain as "lit

    The author says in the 2nd paragraph that "when I get angry, I generally do so for a reason" to imply that when he's angry for a reason there would be activity in both the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. Maybe most anger is complex, reason-based anger, but the author has left room for the possibility that some anger is just pure irrational anger. That type of anger might only light up in one region. We don't have any direct support about what the subtractive method would show about anger, and this answer makes it seem like anger is guaranteed to trigger multiple brain regions to be higher than normal.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free