Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT148 S2 P4 Q27 Explanation

Brain Scans

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

There are some basic conceptual problems hovering about the widespread use of brain scans as pictures of mental activity. As applied to medical diagnosis (for example, in diagnosing a brain tumor), a brain scan is similar in principle to an X-ray: it is a way of seeing inside the body. Its value are instantiated in localized brain regions. This premise is known as the modular theory of mind.

It may in fact be that neither mental activity, nor the physical processes that constitute it, are decomposable into independent modules. Psychologist William Uttal contends that rather than distinct entities, the various mental processes are likely to be properties of a more general mental activity that is distributed throughout the brain. It so for a reason. To cleanly separate emotion from reason-giving makes a hash of human experience.

But if this critique of the modular theory of mind is valid, how can one account for the fact that brain scans do, in fact, reveal well-defined areas that “light up” in response to various cognitive tasks? In the case of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), what you are seeing when you remains after the subtraction represents the metabolic activity associated solely with the cognitive task in question.

One immediately obvious (but usually unremarked) problem is that this method obscures the fact that the entire brain is active in both conditions. A false impression of neat functional localization is given by differential brain scans that subtract out all the distributed brain functions. This subtractive method produces striking images of the it is illustrated so well by the products of the subtractive method?

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

Which one of the following is most analogous to the manner in which fMRI scans of brain activity are typically interpreted, as described in

Answer choices

  1. Weak Match15% picked this

    One particular district in the city voted for the new mayor by an unusually large margin, so the mayor could not

    It takes a second to realize that these answers are going to be giving us mini-arguments, so we should be expecting to match it up with the passage by finding an answer that sounds like, "We see [this sort of thing on the fMRI], so we should interpret that to mean [modular theory]." The essence of this answer choice is We see an unusually high differential in this region, so this region must have been crucial to the task I don't hate that, out of the gate. An "unusually large margin" is kind of like looking at differentials. But ultimately this is not the easiest available answer to match up with the passage. The modular theory, as far as we've heard, never assumed that "if unusually high differential, then necessary for that task". It was more like, "If there's a differential in that region, then and only then is that region involved in the task."

  2. Correct52% picked this

    A store launched a yearlong advertising campaign and had an increase in shoppers only during the summer, so the advertisements

    Why this is right

    The essence of this answer is "if uptick was only during the summer, then causal influence was only during the summer" Can we match that to, "If we see this on an fMRI, it means [modular theory]"? Yes, especially if we rephrase what this answer is saying into a form like, "Since there wasn't an increase of shoppers in other seasons, the ads didn't affect shoppers in other seasons." That's pretty similar to how the subtractive method gets interpreted: "If there wasn't an increase of brain activity in these regions of the brain, then task X didn't affect those regions of the brain". And, positively, "If someone doing task X only has an increase in activity in this region, then task X only affects that region".

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Match17% picked this

    Much more of the water supply is used by agricultural customers than by residential customers, so it is the agricultural sector that is

    How well can we assign this argument to, "We see [this sort of thing on the fMRI], so we should interpret that to mean [modular theory]." The essence of this answer choice is We see more of X is used by A than by B, so A is particularly affected by a shortage of X. That doesn't really match up with anything. The first half doesn't sound like an fMRI, because fMRI's aren't comparing region A to region B. They're comparing region A's baseline to region A's activity level while doing task X. Also, the conclusion half here is saying "this is the region most affected by a shortage", and that doesn't match up with any of the modular / subtractive takeaways we heard in the passage.

  4. Bad Match14% picked this

    Internet traffic is highest during the evening hours, so most Internet traffic during these peak hours originates in homes

    Can we assign this argument to, "We see [this sort of thing on the fMRI], so we should interpret that to mean [this sort of modular theory concept]." The essence of this answer choice is X is higher at night, so X is related more to residences than workplaces. That doesn't really match up with anything. This interpretation relies on a pretty specific assumption that "people are more often in their homes than in office buildings during the evening hours". That assumption has nothing do to with fMRI's.

  5. Bad Match2% picked this

    The cheetah is the world's fastest land animal only for short distances, so most cheetahs cannot outrun another

    Can we assign this argument to, "We see [this sort of thing on the fMRI], so we should interpret that to mean [something related to modular theory]"? The essence of this answer choice is A is the #1 thing of its type only when it comes to task X, so most A's must lose to other things of its type when it comes to things not like task X. That doesn't really match up with anything. It's making a very specific move from "if you're group isn't #1 for task X, then most thing in your group cannot do task X better than anyone else outside you're group." If we just focus on the first half, there's no way to match up "cheetah is #1 only for category X" with the fMRI scans. There was no "#1, but only for category X".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free