Principle: A government should reduce taxes on imports if doing so would financially benefit many consumers in its domestic economy.
Evidence (Principle)
A government should reduce taxes on imports if doing so would financially benefit many consumers in its domestic economy. FBC → RTI
There is an exception: [The government] should never reduce import taxes if one or more of its domestic industries would be significantly harmed by the added competition. HDI → ~RTI
Conclusion
The government should not reduce taxes on textile imports. ~RTI
Evaluate
The principle describes a situation where the government should reduce taxes on imports, but describes one exception. If the exception is triggered, the government should not reduce these taxes.
If we know for a fact that the exception is being triggered, we can properly conclude that the government should not reduce taxes on textile imports.
If reducing taxes on textile imports will create added competition that harms one or more domestic industries, that triggers the exception.
Goal
Expect an answer to state that reducing taxes on textile imports will create added competition that harms one or more domestic industries. Beware of answers that trigger the normal situation—benefitting many consumers—and answers that involve tangentially related topics which are not actually connected to the principle.