Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT148 S4 Q13 Explanation

The Frauenkirche in Dresden

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The Frauenkirche in Dresden, a historic church destroyed by bombing in World War II, has been reconstructed to serve as a place for church services and cultural events. The foundation doing the reconstruction took extraordinary care to return the church to its original form. It is a puzzle, then, why the foundation a donor had offered to pay the full cost of rebuilding the original.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to resolve the

Answer choices

  1. Correct82% picked this

    An eighteenth-century baroque organ cannot adequately produce much of the organ music now played in

    Why this is right

    This gives us a strong reason why we can't use the 18th century one, and why we'd rather have the modern organ. This reconstructed church is being reconstructed "to serve as a place for church services and cultural events". If those church services and cultural events are going to be able to make use of this bad-ass in house organ, then it needs to be the modern style organ. The 18th century style can't adequately produce much of the music that would get played at today's church services and concerts. (Maybe the old organ only has 40 keys, or maybe it doesn't have foot pedals for bass notes, or it doesn't have vibrato, who knows) The idea is that building an old-school organ would mean it's just decorative, not useful. They want to return the church to its original form as much as possible but still have it be a functional church, and today's church music needs at least six octaves, baby!

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Deepens Paradox2% picked this

    The organ originally designed for the church had some features that

    This makes the old organ sound like a better choice and the new organ sound like the worse choice. That's the opposite of what we want.

  3. No Impact1% picked this

    The donation for rebuilding the original eighteenth-century baroque organ was designated for

    We wouldn't really care if the donation had been designated for multiple purposes. The fact would remain that a donor was willing to pay for the old organ, so cost wasn't the issue. If anything, though, saying that this donation was only being offered for the organ shuts down the possibility that they decided against rebuilding the classic organ in order to funnel that donation money toward some more desired part of the reconstruction projects. So it would rule out a possible explanation for why they didn't rebuild the old organ (it wasn't because they wanted to use that donation money elsewhere).

  4. No Impact15% picked this

    By the time the church was destroyed in World War II, the eighteenth-century baroque organ had

    If the goal were to reconstruct the church in its original form, then you would presumably want the original organ, before the modifications. Even if your goal were to reconstruct the church in its original form but replicate the old organ in its final WWII form, that would still mean replicating an organ from 1942, not a modern organ.

  5. No Impact0% picked this

    In the eighteenth century, the organ played an important role in church services

    No one's debating whether or not they should have an organ. We don't need an explanation for why a church might want an organ. We want to know why they went with the modern organ rather than the original 18th century organ, and this answer isn't speaking to anything that helps us distinguish between those two options.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free