Editorial: Teenagers tend to wake up around 8:00 A.M., the time when they stop releasing melatonin, and are sleepy if made to wake up earlier.
Conclusion
If the school day started later than 8am, car accidents involving teenagers driving to school could be reduced.
Evidence (since, indeed)
Sleepiness can impair driving ability.
Teens tend to wake up around 8am.
If teens are made to wake up earlier, they are sleepy.
When Granville’s high school pushed back its starting time to 830am, the overall number of car accidents involving teen drivers declined in Granville.
Evaluate
Well, this is a mouthful to take in. On one hand we have a Comparison situation because the author is proposing a certain Plan (later start time for school day) and predicting a certain Result/Goal (reduce accidents involving teens driving to school).
We have to consider differences between “Plan World” and “Actual World”.
The author is highlighting one thing that will change, [teens are hopefully less sleepy while driving to school], but we need to consider what other things might change? Maybe the normal rush hour in Granville is from 8am - 9am, so if we are suddenly adding teen drivers to that mix, we’re making that hour of driving more dangerous in a way that might actually add more accidents involving teen drivers. LSAT loves to test the idea of a Plan backfiring and making something worse in an unanticipated way. This Plan also assumes that it’s feasible for teens to sleep in to 8am, regardless of school start time. Maybe their parents are waking them up by 7am
Remember, teens don’t have to cause the accident. As long as their in an accident with some road-rage morning commuter, it still counts as “an accident involving teenagers”.
There’s also a conditional logic element to this answer. If teens are made to wake up earlier than 8, they are sleepy. Our author seems to be assuming a difference, that
Finally, there’s the Interpreting a Curious Fact part of this argument. The author is assuming that the number of car accidents decreased when Granville’s high school pushed its start time back is because there was less sleepy driving to school by teens. But maybe there’s some alternate explanation for why number of car accidents went down (i.e. a pandemic where everyone has to stay home).
Goal
Yikes, so how many pressure points does this argument have?
- we want to know that if schools pushed back their start times, it would be feasible for teens to wake up later, that they would do so, that they would be less sleepy as a result of doing so, and that changing their drive-to-school times later would not create any new issues that might facilitate more accidents involving teens.
- additionally, we’re in the market for any answers ruling out alternate explanations for why teen accidents declined in Granville or making it more plausible that the change of start time for the high school was the reason.