Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT148 S1 Q15 Explanation

Sanchez: The sixteen new computers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Sanchez: The sixteen new computers that the school purchased were not as expensive as many people assume. So it isn't true spent on computers.

Merriweather: It isn't that the school paid more for each computer than it was worth, but that the computers that were purchased were they needed to be.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Sanchez and Merriweather disagree over

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: need1% picked this

    needed sixteen new

    We can't support the Agree position or the Disagree position for this answer, because neither person spoke to whether or not the school needed sixteen new computers.

  2. Out of Scope: more computers2% picked this

    purchased more computers than it should

    We can't support the Agree position or the Disagree position for this answer, because neither person is talking about whether the school bought too many computers. They're arguing over whether the school spend too much money on new computers. The dispute is about the money spent, not about the quantity purchased.

  3. Correct88% picked this

    spent more in purchasing the sixteen computers than it

    Why this is right

    Sanchez pretty much states the Disagree position: it isn't true that too much was spent on computers. And Merrieweather supports the Agree position: it is true that too much was spent on computers. After all, the computers that were purchased were much more elaborate than they needed to be.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unsupported Agree Position6% picked this

    paid more for each computer than it

    We know that Merriweather supports the Disagree position, because she states that the school did not "pay more for each computer than it was worth". But we can't support the Agree position from Sanchez's statements. Nothing he says suggests that the school paid more for each computer than it was worth. If anything, he's insinuating that the school got a good price on the computers, because he says "they weren't as expensive as people assume".

  5. Out of Scope: harshly criticized3% picked this

    has been harshly criticized for purchasing the

    We can't support Agree or Disagree with this, because neither person talked about whether or not the school had been harshly criticized.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free