Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT154 S3 P3 Q19 ExplanationMicrobiologist Rita Colwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsParagraph PurposeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

For nearly a century after the discovery in the 1880s that a bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, causes cholera, scientists believed that it traveled to new geographic regions only via human hosts and that epidemics typically occurred when the bacteria spread through contamination, by human waste, of food and unchlorinated water supplies. But scientists spontaneously around the world, often where it was thought to have been eradicated?

In the 1970s, microbiologist Rita Colwell’s claim that she had isolated V. cholerae from the Chesapeake Bay in the eastern United States met with great skepticism, as no biologists believed V. cholerae could persist without a human host, and no cholera outbreaks were occurring anywhere near the Chesapeake. Indeed, there had been 52 suspect water samples, whereas culture techniques found them in only 7 of the same samples.

Colwell’s further studies revealed that V. cholerae, like some other bacteria, goes into a dormant, sporelike state when environmental conditions do not favor reproduction; in this state, the bacterium’s metabolic rate plummets and the bacterium shrinks some 15-to 300-fold. It stops reproducing and therefore cannot be cultured. This “viable but nonculturable” state, that changes in seawater temperature or salinity are what enable them to spread among humans again.

What this question is testing

Paragraph Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main purpose of the final paragraph

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope: obstacles6% picked this

    to identify future directions for research within a field of study and describe the obstacles that researchers

    Does the last paragraph identify future directions for research? Sure. Since the last few sentences reveal the limits of our knowledge and show out current speculations, we would reasonably think that investigating these speculations would be a future direction for research. But where does it mention obstacles to that research? And why isn't this answer acknowledging that the beginning of this last paragraph contains the big Payoff of the whole passage: the Answer to the Question! How does V.c survive outside of human hosts? dormant, smaller, non-reproductive sporelike state

  2. Correct69% picked this

    to answer a question raised earlier in the passage and provide new evidence that gives

    Why this is right

    The question raised earlier: How does V.c survive outside of human hosts? The answer provided at the beginning of this paragraph: dormant, smaller, non-reproductive sporelike state And then the last couple sentences talk about a correlation between sea-temp peaks and V.c awakenings, giving rise to further questions about whether environmental cues like sea temperature are one of the environmental "wake-up calls" that V.c. gets.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope4% picked this

    to evaluate the effect an innovative methodology described earlier in the passage is likely to

    Out of Scope: effects of antibody test Nothing in paragraph 3 is saying "this new antibody test is going to change. the. game."

  4. Out of Scope2% picked this

    to offer recommendations concerning future uses of an innovative methodology described earlier

    Out of Scope: uses of antibody test Nothing in paragraph 3 is recommending, "next thing we should do is try this new antibody test on _____ . " We might assume that as we do more research into the Bay of Bengal, we'll continue to use the antibody test to detect levels of V.c. But we would still reject this answer since it doesn't acknowledge the main point Payoff in the first half of this paragraph.

  5. Out of Scope: effects of phenomenon19% picked this

    to enumerate the effects of a biological phenomenon described in the previous paragraph and describe the limits of

    The biological phenomenon described in the second paragraph was that V.c was present in some coastal waters. What were the effects of V.c being present in the Chesapeake and bayou regions? Were other sea life affected? Nothing like that is discussed. If we swapped out the word "effects" for "causes", then maybe we're talking. This last paragraph was trying to explain how the biological phenomenon in the previous paragraph could have occurred and describes the limits of our current knowledge regarding how that biological phenomenon transitions into the biological phenomenon we described in the first paragraph (cholera outbreaks).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free