Reading Comprehension

PT154 · S3 · P3 · Q19 Microbiologist Rita Colwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

For nearly a century after the discovery in the 1880s that a bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, causes cholera, scientists believed that it traveled to new geographic regions only via human hosts and that epidemics typically occurred when the bacteria spread through contamination, by human waste, of food and unchlorinated water supplies.

Topic

The discovery that the cholera-causing bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, can survive in water environments—often in a dormant state—rather than exclusively needing a human host.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

For many years, scientists thought cholera outbreaks required an active human carrier, but Rita Colwell's research revealed that Vibrio cholerae can survive in seawater in a dormant, nonculturable state, explaining how the disease seems to arise "spontaneously" even after eradication. The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the start of P3:

P1: Traditional View and the Mystery

Scientists originally thought Vibrio cholerae only spread through humans and contaminated water or food, but this left them puzzled about how cholera could resurface years after seemingly disappearing.

P2: Colwell Challenges the Old View

In the 1970s, Rita Colwell discovered Vibrio cholerae in seawater far from disease outbreaks, which shocked the scientific community. She developed a new detection technique (using fluorescence with antibodies) that found the bacteria in local waters and in many more samples than older methods—supporting her hypothesis that cholera bacteria could persist in the environment, undetected.

P3: The "Dormant State" Explanation

Colwell’s later work showed that the bacteria can enter a dormant, nonculturable state to survive until conditions improve. This allows Vibrio cholerae to persist in the environment, potentially reactivating with environmental changes like warmer sea temperatures, hence explaining spontaneous outbreaks.

19.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main purpose of the final paragraph of the passage?

  1. to identify future directions for

    Out of Scope: obstacles

    Does the last paragraph identify future directions for research? Sure. Since the last few sentences reveal the limits of our knowledge and show out current speculations, we would reasonably think that investigating these speculations would be a future direction for research. But where does it mention obstacles to that research? And why isn't this answer acknowledging that the beginning of this last paragraph contains the big Payoff of the whole passage: the Answer to the Question! How does V.c survive outside of human hosts? dormant, smaller, non-reproductive sporelike state

    6% picked this

  2. Correct

    to answer a question raised

    Why this is right

    The question raised earlier: How does V.c survive outside of human hosts? The answer provided at the beginning of this paragraph: dormant, smaller, non-reproductive sporelike state And then the last couple sentences talk about a correlation between sea-temp peaks and V.c awakenings, giving rise to further questions about whether environmental cues like sea temperature are one of the environmental "wake-up calls" that V.c. gets.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    70% picked this

  3. to evaluate the effect an

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: effects of antibody test Nothing in paragraph 3 is saying "this new antibody test is going to change. the. game."

    4% picked this

  4. to offer recommendations concerning future

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: uses of antibody test Nothing in paragraph 3 is recommending, "next thing we should do is try this new antibody test on _____ . " We might assume that as we do more research into the Bay of Bengal, we'll continue to use the antibody test to detect levels of V.c. But we would still reject this answer since it doesn't acknowledge the main point Payoff in the first half of this paragraph.

    1% picked this

  5. to enumerate the effects of

    Out of Scope: effects of phenomenon

    The biological phenomenon described in the second paragraph was that V.c was present in some coastal waters. What were the effects of V.c being present in the Chesapeake and bayou regions? Were other sea life affected? Nothing like that is discussed. If we swapped out the word "effects" for "causes", then maybe we're talking. This last paragraph was trying to explain how the biological phenomenon in the previous paragraph could have occurred and describes the limits of our current knowledge regarding how that biological phenomenon transitions into the biological phenomenon we described in the first paragraph (cholera outbreaks).

    20% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free