Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT154 S3 P3 Q20 ExplanationMicrobiologist Rita Colwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

For nearly a century after the discovery in the 1880s that a bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, causes cholera, scientists believed that it traveled to new geographic regions only via human hosts and that epidemics typically occurred when the bacteria spread through contamination, by human waste, of food and unchlorinated water supplies. But scientists spontaneously around the world, often where it was thought to have been eradicated?

In the 1970s, microbiologist Rita Colwell’s claim that she had isolated V. cholerae from the Chesapeake Bay in the eastern United States met with great skepticism, as no biologists believed V. cholerae could persist without a human host, and no cholera outbreaks were occurring anywhere near the Chesapeake. Indeed, there had been 52 suspect water samples, whereas culture techniques found them in only 7 of the same samples.

Colwell’s further studies revealed that V. cholerae, like some other bacteria, goes into a dormant, sporelike state when environmental conditions do not favor reproduction; in this state, the bacterium’s metabolic rate plummets and the bacterium shrinks some 15-to 300-fold. It stops reproducing and therefore cannot be cultured. This “viable but nonculturable” state, that changes in seawater temperature or salinity are what enable them to spread among humans again.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The passage suggests that Colwell most likely holds which one of the following views

Answer choices, explained

  1. Too Strong: most15% picked this

    In most cases, V. cholerae bacteria do not travel to new locations via human hosts, but rather

    We don't have any information that labels what happens in 51% or more of cases.

  2. Too Strong: most7% picked this

    In most cases, V. cholerae requires a human host in order to awaken and return from dormancy

    We don't have any information that labels what happens in 51% or more of cases.

  3. Too Strong: never9% picked this

    Cholera outbreaks are never caused by the introduction of active V. cholerae bacteria into a new location, but rather by

    It's incredibly unlikely Colwell would believe this, since it would be denying that infected humans, who travel to a new region, wouldn't be able to spread cholera to other human hosts in that new region.

  4. Correct58% picked this

    Use of Colwell’s new detection technique on the water samples she obtained from the Chesapeake Bay would have revealed

    Why this is right

    In the early stage of the 2nd paragraph, we hear that Colwell claimed to have found V.c in the Chesapeake, but biologists were skeptical. Ten years later, she got to test her hypothesis on the New Orleans bayou water. This implies that she didn't yet have the antibody test when we she was making her Chesapeake Bay claims. But since she would presumably believe that she was right to have thought that V.c was present in the Chesapeake, she would assume that her antibody test would have detected its presence. This is a reasonable idea to derive from the passage, but what a silly answer to the way the question stem was phrased. The answer we pick is supposedly a view she holds regarding V.c, and the answer feels way more like a view she has regarding her life history, that happens to involve V.c.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: throughout Asia11% picked this

    Water samples from coastal regions throughout Asia, if subjected to Colwell’s new detection technique, would reveal the

    Can we infer that Colwell thinks that V.c exists throughout Asia right now in its dormant state? She probably thinks that it could show up somewhere in Asia, but this answer implies that water samples from throughout Asia (all of them, not at least one of them) would reveal the presence of V.c. We only really have support, from the final two sentences of the passage, that Colwell thinks that V.c persist in the water in the Bay of Bengal area in south Asia.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free