Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT154 S3 P3 Q17 ExplanationMicrobiologist Rita Colwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

For nearly a century after the discovery in the 1880s that a bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, causes cholera, scientists believed that it traveled to new geographic regions only via human hosts and that epidemics typically occurred when the bacteria spread through contamination, by human waste, of food and unchlorinated water supplies. But scientists spontaneously around the world, often where it was thought to have been eradicated?

In the 1970s, microbiologist Rita Colwell’s claim that she had isolated V. cholerae from the Chesapeake Bay in the eastern United States met with great skepticism, as no biologists believed V. cholerae could persist without a human host, and no cholera outbreaks were occurring anywhere near the Chesapeake. Indeed, there had been 52 suspect water samples, whereas culture techniques found them in only 7 of the same samples.

Colwell’s further studies revealed that V. cholerae, like some other bacteria, goes into a dormant, sporelike state when environmental conditions do not favor reproduction; in this state, the bacterium’s metabolic rate plummets and the bacterium shrinks some 15-to 300-fold. It stops reproducing and therefore cannot be cultured. This “viable but nonculturable” state, that changes in seawater temperature or salinity are what enable them to spread among humans again.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The passage suggests that if V. cholerae bacteria undetectable by traditional culture methods inevitably caused cholera in humans who ingested them, then which one of the following is

Answer choices, explained

  1. Strong: usually Word Salad4% picked this

    Human antibodies that usually latch onto V. cholerae’s cell membrane were unable to do so

    Antibodies have nothing to do with this question. This is just grabbing wording from the second paragraph to make a Word Salad trap answer. The antibody test was something Colwell used to detect V.c in its sporelike state. We don't know if its a human antibody that's used. We also have no reason to think that "in order for a human to get sick from V.c, its antibodies latch onto V.c's cell membrane". The antibody-linking-to-membrane thing just makes it glow so we can detect it.

  2. Too Strong: must reach8% picked this

    The human body’s temperature is the temperature the ocean must reach to awaken V. cholerae bacteria

    This is temptingly close to a reasonable answer: the human body is a set of environmental conditions that favor reproduction (a re-write of the first sentence of the last paragraph). But it's too strong to say the human body temp is how warm the ocean must be. A little outside common sense helps here, as the human body temperature is around 98 degrees Fahrenheit, and there ain't no ocean that's ever 98 degrees, even at its seasonal peak. (right now, Global Warming is listening, thinking, "Hold my beer ...")

  3. Out of Scope: chlorinated water systems6% picked this

    In their dormant state, V. cholerae bacteria are able to survive in

    What on Earth do chlorinated water systems have to do with us saying, "a human ingested a dormant version of V.c and ended up getting sick from it"? I guess this answer is trying to solve the backstory of how a human possible ingested dormant V.c: "it must have been lurking in the water supply ... our chlorination can only do so much!" We can't speculate a backstory; this question is also offering a hypothetical premise, so we can only react to where it goes, not "how we got there". We got there by the question stem stipulating a hypothetical.

  4. Unsupported Relationship2% picked this

    The infected humans had been infected with cholera at some point earlier

    This answer asks that we make the leap of, "If you've previously had cholera, then eating dormant V.c will inevitably make you sick", but we don't have any support for that sort of connection.

  5. Correct81% picked this

    The human body is an environment in which dormant V. cholerae

    Why this is right

    Cholera isn't affecting anyone in its sporelike state. The sporelike state is how cholera manages to persist even though there's no outbreak. In its sporelike state, it can't reproduce, and our common sense understanding of how diseases work is that they must be able to reproduce in order to spread through our body and cause an illness. V.c undetectable by traditional methods is in the sporelike state. If humans ingested V.c and it stayed in its sporelike state, then it couldn't possibly get a human sick. So if we're being told, "actually, ingesting V.c. in this sporelike state DOES invariably get humans sick", we can infer that the V.c., once ingested, awakens from its dormant sporelike state and gets back to its bigger size that can reproduce and cause illness. And so if we know that this sporelike V.c. becomes the non-dormant version inside these humans who ingested it, then we can infer that the human body is an environment in which dormant V.c. can awaken.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free