Reading Comprehension

PT154 · S3 · P3 · Q17 Microbiologist Rita Colwell

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

For nearly a century after the discovery in the 1880s that a bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, causes cholera, scientists believed that it traveled to new geographic regions only via human hosts and that epidemics typically occurred when the bacteria spread through contamination, by human waste, of food and unchlorinated water supplies.

Topic

The discovery that the cholera-causing bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, can survive in water environments—often in a dormant state—rather than exclusively needing a human host.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

For many years, scientists thought cholera outbreaks required an active human carrier, but Rita Colwell's research revealed that Vibrio cholerae can survive in seawater in a dormant, nonculturable state, explaining how the disease seems to arise "spontaneously" even after eradication. The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the start of P3:

P1: Traditional View and the Mystery

Scientists originally thought Vibrio cholerae only spread through humans and contaminated water or food, but this left them puzzled about how cholera could resurface years after seemingly disappearing.

P2: Colwell Challenges the Old View

In the 1970s, Rita Colwell discovered Vibrio cholerae in seawater far from disease outbreaks, which shocked the scientific community. She developed a new detection technique (using fluorescence with antibodies) that found the bacteria in local waters and in many more samples than older methods—supporting her hypothesis that cholera bacteria could persist in the environment, undetected.

P3: The "Dormant State" Explanation

Colwell’s later work showed that the bacteria can enter a dormant, nonculturable state to survive until conditions improve. This allows Vibrio cholerae to persist in the environment, potentially reactivating with environmental changes like warmer sea temperatures, hence explaining spontaneous outbreaks.

17.

The passage suggests that if V. cholerae bacteria undetectable by traditional culture methods inevitably caused cholera in humans who ingested them, then which one of the following is most likely to be true?

  1. Human antibodies that usually latch

    Strong: usually Word Salad

    Antibodies have nothing to do with this question. This is just grabbing wording from the second paragraph to make a Word Salad trap answer. The antibody test was something Colwell used to detect V.c in its sporelike state. We don't know if its a human antibody that's used. We also have no reason to think that "in order for a human to get sick from V.c, its antibodies latch onto V.c's cell membrane". The antibody-linking-to-membrane thing just makes it glow so we can detect it.

    3% picked this

  2. The human body’s temperature is

    Too Strong: must reach

    This is temptingly close to a reasonable answer: the human body is a set of environmental conditions that favor reproduction (a re-write of the first sentence of the last paragraph). But it's too strong to say the human body temp is how warm the ocean must be. A little outside common sense helps here, as the human body temperature is around 98 degrees Fahrenheit, and there ain't no ocean that's ever 98 degrees, even at its seasonal peak. (right now, Global Warming is listening, thinking, "Hold my beer ...")

    7% picked this

  3. In their dormant state, V.

    Out of Scope: chlorinated water systems

    What on Earth do chlorinated water systems have to do with us saying, "a human ingested a dormant version of V.c and ended up getting sick from it"? I guess this answer is trying to solve the backstory of how a human possible ingested dormant V.c: "it must have been lurking in the water supply ... our chlorination can only do so much!" We can't speculate a backstory; this question is also offering a hypothetical premise, so we can only react to where it goes, not "how we got there". We got there by the question stem stipulating a hypothetical.

    5% picked this

  4. The infected humans had been

    Unsupported Relationship

    This answer asks that we make the leap of, "If you've previously had cholera, then eating dormant V.c will inevitably make you sick", but we don't have any support for that sort of connection.

    2% picked this

  5. Correct

    The human body is an

    Why this is right

    Cholera isn't affecting anyone in its sporelike state. The sporelike state is how cholera manages to persist even though there's no outbreak. In its sporelike state, it can't reproduce, and our common sense understanding of how diseases work is that they must be able to reproduce in order to spread through our body and cause an illness. V.c undetectable by traditional methods is in the sporelike state. If humans ingested V.c and it stayed in its sporelike state, then it couldn't possibly get a human sick. So if we're being told, "actually, ingesting V.c. in this sporelike state DOES invariably get humans sick", we can infer that the V.c., once ingested, awakens from its dormant sporelike state and gets back to its bigger size that can reproduce and cause illness. And so if we know that this sporelike V.c. becomes the non-dormant version inside these humans who ingested it, then we can infer that the human body is an environment in which dormant V.c. can awaken.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free