Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT154 S2 Q11 ExplanationA part of the brain

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A part of the brain called the amygdala is involved in sensing fear. People who have Urbach-Wiethe disease, which destroys the amygdala, generally do not experience fear. They do, however, experience extreme fear when given a breath that as some people with normal amygdalae do.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Unsupported: other responses1% picked this

    Extreme fear is not the only intense response that people can have to a breath that is

    The only response we have been told people have to a breath high in CO2 is extreme fear. It's certainly very plausible that people could have other responses (this is very mild wording), but we have no support for any other responses.

  2. Unsupported: other functions2% picked this

    Sensing fear is not the only function the amygdala

    The only function we have been told the amygdala has is related to sensing fear. It's certainly very plausible that the amygdala could have other functions (this is very mild wording), but we have no support for any other function.

  3. Unsupported: other diseases0% picked this

    Urbach-Wiethe disease is not the only disease that can destroy

    The only disease we have been told that destroys the amygdala is U-W disease. It's certainly possible that other diseases can also have that effect, but we have no information about any other diseases, so we have no support for this answer.

  4. Unsupported: other parts of brain1% picked this

    The amygdala is not the only part of the brain that can be affected

    The only part of the brain we were told is affected by U-W disease is the amygdala. It's possible that this disease affects other parts of the brain, but we have no support for that idea.

  5. Correct95% picked this

    The amygdala is not the only part of the brain that can be involved

    Why this is right

    This is thinly supported, but supported, and since we had no support for the other answers, thinly supported = most supported. Since we're being told about people who don't have amygdalae (or functionally speaking don't, since it's been destroyed) are still capable of sensing fear. There's no way the amygdala is making these people with destroyed-amygdalae sense fear, so there must be something else making them sense fear. Do we know that this something else is a different part of the brain? Definitely not. It might just be something reflexive in the spinal cord, like some other reflexes are. Maybe it's found in the nasal canal. Who knows. But given that fear is a psychological phenomenon and given that we know the brain is responsible for psychological phenomena, it's very plausible that a different body part that causes us to sense fear would still involve part of the brain. Again, the support for this answer is that we know "something besides the amygdala is also involved in sensing fear". If we feel bad picking this answer because that support isn't really sufficient to prove (E) is true, we have to remind ourselves that we're doing Most Supported, not Must Be True.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free