Philosopher: A person is morally responsible for an action only if that action is performed freely.
Statements
conditionals (only if - necessary / right)
Morally → action performed responsible freely
action performed → alternative action that's freely genuinely open to person
alternative action → performing that action genuinely open is not morally wrong
Evaluate
Whenever we see conditionals in Inference questions, we want to ask ourselves two things: 1. Are there any other conditionals I could chain this up with? 2. Are there any facts I could apply this to (via contrapositive usually)
It seems like all three of these claims could chain together since the 1st and 2nd sentences both mention free actions, and the 2nd and 3rd both mention an alternative action that's genuinely open.
Morally action alt. action alt. action is responsible → freely → genuinely → not morally for action performed open wrong
Let's put this front to back in conversational times. If you're morally responsible for action X, then you freely performed X, which means you had a morally acceptable action Y that was an alternative action genuinely open to you.
Meanwhile, if there's no other morally acceptable action available to you when you do action X, then you're not morally responsible for X.
Goal
Look for anything provable, but expect the correct answer to reward us for linking together that chain, and look for trap answers that do illegal reversals or negations.