Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT154 S4 Q6 ExplanationHistorian: Much of what made

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Historian: Much of what made medieval European communities as close-knit as they usually were was the way they went about meeting basic needs. In medieval communities, in order to get crops harvested or a well dug, people had to come together in respectful cooperation, suspending any private grievances. corresponding group tasks, their communities would probably become more close-knit.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in

Answer choices, explained

  1. Unrelated to Goal Intermediate Conclusion3% picked this

    Much of what made medieval communities as close-knit as they usually were was the way they went

    This doesn't look anything like the last sentence, since it's talking about medieval times, so we don't need to read it. If we did, we'd see it's the first sentence, which could be called an Intermediate Conclusion since it's supported by the second sentence.

  2. Trap3% picked this

    People in industrialized societies today should undertake group tasks similar to those that medieval communities undertook in order

    Should vs. If Bad Match: missing "close-knit" This is pretty similar to the final sentence, but the final sentence has the form, "If today's people undertook group tasks like the ones medieval communities undertook to meet basic needs, then today's people would be more close knit". And this sentence just says, "They should undertake these group tasks". The author wasn't explicitly providing advice, so the "should" feels a little strong, but most importantly this would be missing half of what the conclusion is saying. The conclusion is saying, "If people did X, then Y would happen", and this answer is just saying, "People should do X".

  3. Unrelated to Goal Premise1% picked this

    In medieval communities, people went about meeting basic needs in ways that required them to come together in respectful

    This doesn't look anything like the last sentence, since it's talking about medieval times, so we don't need to read it. If we do read it, we'll see it's the second sentence, which was a premise.

  4. Unrelated to Goal Unstated Inference2% picked this

    Medieval communities were usually more close-knit than communities in industrial societies are today because, in medieval communities, people undertook group tasks requiring them

    This doesn't look anything like the last sentence, since it's talking about medieval times, so we don't need to read it. If we do read it, we'll see it's actually creating a brand new claim that was never said (making it very unattractive as an answer). It's designed to feel like a correct answer on Inference, but we're doing Main Conclusion.

  5. Correct91% picked this

    Communities in industrial societies today would probably become more close-knit if their members undertook group tasks requiring the participants to

    Why this is right

    This best matches the meaning of the final sentence, which was the conclusion.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free