Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT154 S3 P1 Q3 Explanation

Great Zimbabwe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogySociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Complex societies flourished on the central plateau of southern Africa from the ninth through sixteenth centuries. Their regional political centers, called zimbabwes, were city-states enclosed within stone walls, which still exist as archaeological monuments. Great Zimbabwe, the largest of these, was the product of a highly stratified society whose ruling class wielded the zimbabwe economic system that is actually the most crucial element in understanding Great Zimbabwe’s achievements.

During the fourteenth century, the population of Great Zimbabwe probably exceeded 10,000. This was an extraordinary size for a city at that time in an environment of typical African savanna woodland, because the only system of crop cultivation these soils could support was one that involved long fallow periods between plantings, a pattern of centralized control over the society, with cattle becoming the property of a ruling class.

Ordinary people were given use of individual cattle as an act of royal patronage. Because cattle exchange was an essential element in marriage contracts, the power of the royal class reached deep into everyone’s lives. Similarly, the crucial role of cattle also explains Great Zimbabwe’s successful mining industry. Gold is found in to laborers that royalty was able to muster the human resources necessary for large-scale gold mining.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

Based on the passage, the relationship of Great Zimbabwe’s cattle economy to the size of Great Zimbabwe’s population is most analogous

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match5% picked this

    hunting and

    Hunting is what makes gathering possible? That doesn't make sense. Those are two parallel things people do to stay alive. Hunting and Gathering make survival possible.

  2. Correct64% picked this

    irrigation and a farm in a

    Why this is right

    Irrigation is what makes farming in the desert possible? Sure! If you're in a desert, you don't have rain, so you can't get water to your crops via that means. Thus, you would need irrigation, the funneling of water from elsewhere into your farm, in order to make farming in the desert possible.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Match3% picked this

    accounting and

    Accounting is what makes marketing possible? That doesn't make sense. Marketing isn't made possible because of accounting.

  4. Weak Match10% picked this

    sports stadiums and athletic

    Sports stadiums are what makes athletic contests possible? Hmmm, kind of. Obviously you can easily have athletic contests in someone's backyard or on a random hillside, so there's not really a relationship of necessity there. Also, in comparing this to (B), (B) would have a stronger connection to the ideas of human ecological constraints. It's hard to farm in a desert. It's hard to support 10,000 people in a region that can't do mass agriculture. But irrigation allows you to bring water to the desert. Cattle economy allows you to bring beef to the populace. Sports stadiums allow you to bring corporate sponsorship and local tax revenue to your sporting contests. :)

  5. Bad Match19% picked this

    individual stones and a stone

    Individual stones is what makes a stone wall possible? Sure, but that's in a specific Part to Whole context. We're not saying that "lots of individual cattle economies add up to great the size of GZ's population". We want more like "there's a problem to be solved, and here is the solution".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free