Reading Comprehension

PT154 · S3 · P1 · Q3 Great Zimbabwe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Complex societies flourished on the central plateau of southern Africa from the ninth through sixteenth centuries.

Topic

The economic foundations and societal structure of Great Zimbabwe in southern Africa, especially the central role of cattle agriculture.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

While it's often said that Great Zimbabwe's prosperity was due to its control of gold mining and the gold trade, the passage argues that the most important factor was actually its complex agricultural system centered on cattle. The Most Valuable Sentence appears near the end of the first paragraph:

P1: Introduction & Challenging Conventional Wisdom

The author introduces Great Zimbabwe as a highly stratified, prosperous society famous for its stone city-states. The usual explanation is that its success was due to control of gold mining and trading, but the author pivots and says the real key was its agricultural system.

P2: Explaining the Unique Agricultural System

Without the ability to farm intensively, store grain in bulk, or transport it, Great Zimbabwe thrived in an environment where most societies stayed small and mobile. Instead, they developed an advanced system of cattle herding, moving herds seasonally for grazing. Managing these herds required large-scale coordination and enabled centralized, elite control.

P3: Social and Economic Impact of the Cattle Economy

Cattle ownership by the elite not only structured society but also influenced everyday life and marital arrangements. Cattle were so crucial that they also facilitated the gold mining industry; the royal class could motivate enough labor for demanding mining tasks by granting cattle as rewards. This further strengthened central authority and economic success.

3.

Based on the passage, the relationship of Great Zimbabwe's cattle economy to the size of Great Zimbabwe's population is most analogous to the relationship between

  1. hunting and gathering

    Bad Match

    Hunting is what makes gathering possible? That doesn't make sense. Those are two parallel things people do to stay alive. Hunting and Gathering make survival possible.

    4% picked this

  2. Correct

    irrigation and a farm in

    Why this is right

    Irrigation is what makes farming in the desert possible? Sure! If you're in a desert, you don't have rain, so you can't get water to your crops via that means. Thus, you would need irrigation, the funneling of water from elsewhere into your farm, in order to make farming in the desert possible.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    64% picked this

  3. accounting and marketing

    Bad Match

    Accounting is what makes marketing possible? That doesn't make sense. Marketing isn't made possible because of accounting.

    3% picked this

  4. sports stadiums and athletic contests

    Weak Match

    Sports stadiums are what makes athletic contests possible? Hmmm, kind of. Obviously you can easily have athletic contests in someone's backyard or on a random hillside, so there's not really a relationship of necessity there. Also, in comparing this to (B), (B) would have a stronger connection to the ideas of human ecological constraints. It's hard to farm in a desert. It's hard to support 10,000 people in a region that can't do mass agriculture. But irrigation allows you to bring water to the desert. Cattle economy allows you to bring beef to the populace. Sports stadiums allow you to bring corporate sponsorship and local tax revenue to your sporting contests. :)

    10% picked this

  5. individual stones and a stone

    Bad Match

    Individual stones is what makes a stone wall possible? Sure, but that's in a specific Part to Whole context. We're not saying that "lots of individual cattle economies add up to great the size of GZ's population". We want more like "there's a problem to be solved, and here is the solution".

    18% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free