It is morally praiseworthy to be honest only if one is honest out of respect for morality.
Conclusion (therefore)
Telling the judge the truth about his business partner's fraudulence was not worthy of praise.
Evidence
If you're not being honest out of respect for morality, then it's not worthy of praise.
He was honest, but he was motivated by concern for his own well-being.
Evaluate
We're trying to prove that a certain action was "not worthy of moral praise". Did the argument provide any proving-mechanism like, "If xyz, then not worthy of moral praise"?
It did! There's a conditional premise that says, .
So we know our legal job. We need to establish that Downing's honesty not honest out of respect for morality.
Did the argument give us any proving-mechanism like, ?
No, so the correct answer will have to do give us that. We only know that Downing was motivated by concern for his own well-being.
Goal
So we need to hear that,