Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT154 S1 Q11 ExplanationIt is morally praiseworthy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

It is morally praiseworthy to be honest only if one is honest out of respect for morality. Strictly speaking, therefore, Downing did not act in a manner worthy of such praise when he told the judge the truth about his business partner’s fraudulence. well-being—even though what he did was certainly honest.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope: moral condemnation5% picked this

    An action motivated by concern for oneself cannot be deserving of

    We're looking for a missing link like, "An action motivated by concern for onseself cannot also be done out of respect for morality". Since this answer won't allow us to prove that Downing's honesty was not out of respect for morality, it's functionally useless to us.

  2. Too Weak: some Unrelated to Goal10% picked this

    Some actions that are essentially honest are not

    Answers that provide only one-data-point worth of information are almost always wrong on Strengthen / Weaken / Paradox / Principle-Strengthen / Sufficient Assumption, so seeing this answer begin Some is an immediate red flag. Since this answer won't allow us to prove that Downing's honesty was not out of respect for morality, it's functionally useless to us.

  3. Correct82% picked this

    An action performed out of respect for morality cannot also be an action motivated by

    Why this is right

    Like most correct answers on Sufficient Assumption, this gives us the correct answer in contrapositive form. It says: Performed out of ? not motivated by respect for morality concern for self And the contrapositive matches our prediction Motivated by ? not performed out of concern for self respect for morality If we prefer to view the whole thing formally, the Conclusion we need to prove looks like this logic path (we extend the arrow so that we can see which parts of the path have been supplied by the evidence). CONC Downing's -------------------------> not worthy action of praise EVIDENCE Downing's -> motiv by action cncrn 4 self not out of ----> not worthy resp 4 moral of praise The conclusion is trying to get from Idea 1 to Idea 4. The evidence connects 1 to 2, and it connects 3 to 4. Our answer provides the missing link from 2 to 3.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    The moral praiseworthiness of an action can be judged only according to standards that refer to the circumstances

    We're looking for a missing link like, "An action motivated by concern for onseself cannot also be done out of respect for morality". Since this answer won't allow us to prove that Downing's honesty was not out of respect for morality, it's functionally useless to us.

  5. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    Morality demands that one be honest, even in cases where this could be detrimental to

    We're looking for a missing link like, "An action motivated by concern for onseself cannot also be done out of respect for morality". Since this answer won't allow us to prove that Downing's honesty was not out of respect for morality, it's functionally useless to us.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free