Most people who regularly eat
Why this is right
This gives us a potential mechanism for explaining who nut-eaters are less likely to be overweight. Most of them (most = strong, which is what we want on Strengthen / Weaken / Paradox) eat less of foods that stimulate a hunger response. In other words, eating other foods stimulates a hunger response, which presumably leads to more eating, which leads to more calories. Eating nuts is unlike that. Person 1 eats nuts. Person 2 doesn't eat nuts; they eat food X instead. The taste of nuts doesn't stimulate a hunger response. The taste of X does, which means Person 2 gets hungry and decides to also eat more X or to eat food Y. Food Y might also stimulate a hunger response, and so you can create a positive feedback loop where the taste of the last food you ate stimulates hunger for more food. Thus, even if nuts are higher in calories than are foods X or Y, a person eating nuts stops with nuts. Meanwhile, non-nut people get caught in this feedback loop of eating lower-calorie foods that stimulate a response to eat even more foods. So this gives us a potential story for how people who eat nuts, which are high in calories, might still end up consuming fewer calories overall (since nuts don't stimulate a hunger response as other foods do), and thus could be less likely to be overweight than people who don't eat nuts.
Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.