Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT151 S2 Q26 ExplanationThe advertising campaign for Roadwise

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The advertising campaign for Roadwise auto insurance is notable for the variety of its commercials, which range from straightforward and informative to funny and offbeat. This is unusual in the advertising world, where companies typically strive for uniformity in advertising in order to establish a brand identity with their target approach, since purchasers of auto insurance are so demographically diverse.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

Which one of the following, if true, adds the most support for the conclusion

Answer choices, explained

  1. No Impact Too Weak: sometimes6% picked this

    Advertising campaigns designed to target one demographic sometimes appeal to a wider group of

    Roadwise is not designing ads to target one demographic, so this answer is not relevant to them. Given that it says something good about what they're not doing, one might even say it slightly weakens. However, answers as weak as "some / sometimes / not all" are almost always wrong on Weaken, Strengthen, and Paradox.

  2. Weakens, if Anything6% picked this

    Consistent efforts to establish a brand identity are critical for encouraging product interest and

    This answer makes it seem like creating a firm, stable brand identity is crucial. Meanwhile, Roadwise is adopting a total scattershot approach that would be way less likely to give anyone a clear sense of their brand identity.

  3. Out of Scope5% picked this

    Fewer people are influenced by auto insurance commercials than by commercials for other

    Out of Scope: other types of products This comparison doesn't do anything for the argument. If anything, it seems to weaken the importance or potential effectiveness of any ad for auto insurance.

  4. Correct81% picked this

    Advertising campaigns that target one demographic often alienate people who are not part of

    Why this is right

    This is saying that if Roadwise were to make an ad campaign targeting serious older people, then it would alienate younger people, who also must buy auto insurance. But if Roadwise were to make a wacky ad campaign for younger people, then it would alienate older people. So by creating a wide variety of ads and sort of scrambling any sense of who they're targeting, they make it less likely that any group will feel like, "Clearly, this company doesn't speak to me. I'll look elsewhere".

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unclear Impact: content falls short3% picked this

    Efforts to influence a target demographic do not pay off when the content of the

    This answer, like (D), also presents a negative associated with targeting a specific group (Roadwise is not targeting a specific group). But the negative is contingent on when "the content of the campaign falls short". This paragraph doesn't tell us anything about the content of the ads. We only hear about the style. Thus, this doesn't work as well as (D). They both would potentially strengthen by saying, "An opposite approach has a downside", but it's clearer with (D) that Roadwise is doing the opposite.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free