Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT151 S1 P2 Q14 ExplanationSandra Olsen

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsEvaluateSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history. In remains of pit houses of the Botai people, who inhabited for mortality patterns that might correlate with expectations regarding domesticated herds or wild victims of hunting.

Herders of domesticated animals used for meat or milk typically kill off all but a few males before they are fully mature, but not the females, and archaeologists have evidence of a similar pattern for prehistoric goat herding. At the Botai sites, however, Olsen has found that most of the male horses if the Botai had indeed begun riding, they would likely have kept males alive to ride.

Another clue that at least some of the horses may have been domesticated and that some may have even been ridden is in the fact that their remains include full skeletons, entire vertebral columns, and pelvises. It is unreasonable to suppose that hunters dragged whole 1,000-pound carcasses back to their dwellings. Olsen suggests a relationship to horses beyond that of merely hunting them as a source of meat.

What this question is testing

Evaluate

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Data from which one of the following sources would be most relevant to

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct76% picked this

    tabulation of the number of butchered horse bones versus untouched horse bones in a

    Why this is right

    The concept of whether or not the horse bones were butchered gets back to the issue of whether these horses were chopped down for meat or whether they were living with the Botai, being ridden by them (and maybe even loved as BFF's). If most of the horse bones at the site are untouched, then the horses were presumably not eaten for meat. They died and their entire body was buried (the way you would with a loved one). This supports the hypothesis that "the Botai had horses in order to ride them". If most of the horse bones were butchered, then the horses were presumably eaten for meat, not raised to be ridden. This answer ties into the beginning of the final paragraph, which identifies "full skeletons / entire vertebral columns / pelvises" as a clue that at least some of the horses were domesticated and that some may have even been ridden.

    Skill tested: Evaluate · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. No Impact: sheep / goat bones3% picked this

    tabulation of the number of sheep and goat bones versus the number of horse bones in

    If we knew there were 1,000 sheep/goat bones and only 500 horse bones (or vice versa), would that strengthen or weaken the idea that the horse bones belonged to horses that were ridden by the Botai people? Neither. Who cares how many sheep/goat bones there were at the site. How would that tell us whether the horses were ridden?

  3. No Impact: modern hunters1% picked this

    determination of the number of hunting tribes contemporary with the Botai as opposed to the number of modern hunting

    If we knew there were 100 hunting tribes in the area during the Botai's time there whereas there are only 50 tribes in the area nowadays (or vice versa), would that strengthen or weaken the idea that the horses found at the Botai site were ridden by the Botai people? Neither. Who cares how the number of hunting tribes then vs. now compare. How would that help us assess whether the horse bones we found at the Botai site were hunted wild horses, horses domesticated for meat/milk, or horses domesticated for riding (which could still have been involved in hunting other animals).

  4. No Impact: other species12% picked this

    analysis of mortality patterns in the remains of any other species of animal found

    If we saw bones from pigs at this site, is there something we could learn about the pig bones that would help us assess whether the Botai people domesticated horses for the sake of riding them? No, because horses are pretty unique. They are the only animal (other than maybe camels or elephants in certain exotic contexts) that humans have the option of riding. So whatever the Botai's behavior was in relation to other animal species, it would be hard to carry that over to any inference about horses, because horses are unique in having the potential to also be ridden.

  5. Unclear Impact: ratio of human / horse8% picked this

    analysis of the ratio of human remains to horse remains found in

    If we saw there were 3 human bodies for every 1 horse body (or vice versa), would that tell us anything about whether the horses were domesticated and ridden? It's not clear how a ratio of human remains to horse remains would provide any clarity on that question. If the horses were domesticated in order to be ridden (rather than, say, domesticated for meat and milk), would we expect the ratio of human remains to horse remains to be a certain way? There doesn't seem to be any common sense connection between the ratio of remains and the question of what relationship the Botai had to horses.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free