Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT151 S1 P2 Q10 Explanation

Sandra Olsen

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history. In remains of pit houses of the Botai people, who inhabited for mortality patterns that might correlate with expectations regarding domesticated herds or wild victims of hunting.

Herders of domesticated animals used for meat or milk typically kill off all but a few males before they are fully mature, but not the females, and archaeologists have evidence of a similar pattern for prehistoric goat herding. At the Botai sites, however, Olsen has found that most of the male horses if the Botai had indeed begun riding, they would likely have kept males alive to ride.

Another clue that at least some of the horses may have been domesticated and that some may have even been ridden is in the fact that their remains include full skeletons, entire vertebral columns, and pelvises. It is unreasonable to suppose that hunters dragged whole 1,000-pound carcasses back to their dwellings. Olsen suggests a relationship to horses beyond that of merely hunting them as a source of meat.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

If the horse remains found at the Botai sites had consisted primarily of the bones of fully grown females and young males, the findings would have provided evidence

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: pods vs. families23% picked this

    The Botai targeted male pods when

    If they hunted male pods, then we'd find a lot of adult male bones. In this question, they're finding adult females and young males, which suggests that the Botai were hunting families of horses, not bachelor pods.

  2. Unrelated to Goal Opposite, if anything6% picked this

    The Botai caught, trained, and rode only

    This doesn't sound like either of our predictions. - hunting horse families - domesticating horses for meat/milk It's also kind of an oxymoron to say that a horse that is caught and trained is a "wild" horse. That sounds pretty domesticated. The horses most often ridden were adult males, so it seems like a mismatch for "mainly adult female and young male".

  3. Correct65% picked this

    The Botai had domesticated horses but did not

    Why this is right

    Since these horses weren't adult males, they probably weren't being ridden. Since their whole skeletons were still intact, they probably weren't wild horses who were killed and butchered for transport. So that leaves the idea of domesticated (which fits the profile of not seeing many adult males) and not ridden (which fits the profile of not seeing many adult males).

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Trap5% picked this

    The Botai had developed sources of food other

    Opposite, if anything Out of Scope: other food sources Our leading hypothesis was that "adult females and young males, with fully intact skeletons" means that these were horses that herders had domesticated for meat and milk. In other words, the horses were a source of food. This answer is saying it suggests the opposite?

  5. Out of Scope: cultural rituals1% picked this

    The Botai incorporated the remains of horses into their

    We have no connection from "adult female and young male" to "incorporated into cultural rituals". If anything, we'd expect that a horse that is ridden and bonded with would be involved in cultural rituals, but that type of horse would most likely be adult male.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free