Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT151 S2 Q24 ExplanationEconomist: If minimum wage levels

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Economist: If minimum wage levels are low, employers have a greater incentive to hire more workers than to buy productivity-enhancing new technology. As a result, productivity growth, which is necessary for higher average living standards, falls off. Conversely, high minimum wage levels result in higher productivity. Thus, raising our currently low minimum than any hiring cutbacks triggered by the raise would harm it.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct72% picked this

    Productivity growth in a country usually leads to an eventual increase

    Why this is right

    Cool, we're learning about a good thing that would happen in a world with higher min wage. We were told that higher min wage leads to better productivity growth, and this answer adds on that better productivity growth will usually lead to more job creation. This makes us feel better about "the good outweighs the bad", since the bad was "some people will lose their jobs". This is saying, "Yes, initially ... but ultimately this move will create jobs, so we'll eventually get the boost without much or any of the detriment".

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite4% picked this

    The economist’s country has seen a slow but steady increase in its unemployment rate over

    This doesn't do much, because it's not pointing us to any comparative difference between a world in which we do / don't have a low minimum wage. But since it's saying that unemployment has already been rising for a decade, it sort of makes the detriment of raising the min wage (job losses) sound worse than before, because we'd be adding more job losses to an economy that has already seen growing unemployment for 10 years.

  3. Opposite11% picked this

    A country’s unemployment rate is a key factor in determining its

    If anything this feels like it goes against our author saying that "average living standards track closely to productivity levels". And it feels like if we raised our min wage, which would probably trigger layoffs, we would be increasing our unemployment rate, thereby lowering our average living standards.

  4. Out of Scope Comparison7% picked this

    The economist’s country currently lags behind other countries in the development

    It isn't relevant to this conclusion how this country compares to other countries. It's only relevant whether raising the min wage would make this country's new overall economic health comparatively better than this country's previous overall economic health.

  5. Opposite6% picked this

    Productivity-enhancing new technology tends to quickly

    The author is telling a story in which we raise the min wage, which then incentivizes companies to pursue productivity-enhancing technology. If that technology quickly becomes outdated, it sounds like our author's suggestion is nudging companies towards making an investment with a very short shelf life.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free