Reading Comprehension

PT151 · S1 · P2 · Q13 Sandra Olsen

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history.

Topic

Possible evidence for early horse domestication and riding among the Botai people in Kazakhstan.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Archaeologist Sandra Olsen uses several lines of evidence—mainly patterns in horse bone remains—to argue that the Botai people of Kazakhstan likely domesticated and rode horses around 6,000 years ago, rather than simply hunting them for meat. (The most valuable sentence appears near the end of P1: )

P1: The Puzzle of the Botai Horse Remains

Olsen investigates vast horse bone deposits from the ancient Botai people, noting that horse bones don’t show clear signs of domestication like other animals. She focuses on patterns in the age and sex of the remains to figure out whether these horses were wild or domesticated.

P2: Analyzing the Bone Patterns—Wild or Domesticated?

Olsen explains typical herd management (culling young males) versus hunting patterns. The Botai horses don’t fully match either model: there are many fully grown males, suggesting a different relationship. Olsen suggests that if the Botai were riding horses, they would have kept adult males alive for that purpose.

P3: Skeletal Clues and Special Treatment

Finding whole horse skeletons (not just parts you'd expect from a hunted animal) and evidence of intentional burial alongside human remains further supports the idea that the Botai weren’t just hunting horses, but had a special, possibly domesticated, relationship with them—potentially even riding them.

13.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?

  1. A set of findings is

    Reversed Order

    We actually start with the explanation of the findings (they rode these horses!) and then proceed to describe the set of findings.

    26% picked this

  2. A set of specific observations

    Reversed Order

    The general conclusion drawn from the observations (they rode these horses!) is what comes first, and then the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs enumerate the specific observations.

    14% picked this

  3. A general principle is presented

    Out of Scope: Principle

    There does not seem to be any general principle presented anywhere in the passage (certainly not as the first ingredient), nor do there seem to be examples of a principle.

    1% picked this

  4. Correct

    A hypothesis is outlined and

    Why this is right

    The hypothesis is our very first sentence (hey, I think they rode these horses!), and then the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs laid our the data, assumptions, and reasoning Olson used to arrive at that hypothesis.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    57% picked this

  5. A proposition is stated and

    Out of Scope: arguments against

    We definitely open with a proposition (hey, I think they rode these horses!), but there are never any arguments against Olson's proposition summarized in the passage.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free