Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT151 S1 P2 Q13 Explanation

Sandra Olsen

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history. In remains of pit houses of the Botai people, who inhabited for mortality patterns that might correlate with expectations regarding domesticated herds or wild victims of hunting.

Herders of domesticated animals used for meat or milk typically kill off all but a few males before they are fully mature, but not the females, and archaeologists have evidence of a similar pattern for prehistoric goat herding. At the Botai sites, however, Olsen has found that most of the male horses if the Botai had indeed begun riding, they would likely have kept males alive to ride.

Another clue that at least some of the horses may have been domesticated and that some may have even been ridden is in the fact that their remains include full skeletons, entire vertebral columns, and pelvises. It is unreasonable to suppose that hunters dragged whole 1,000-pound carcasses back to their dwellings. Olsen suggests a relationship to horses beyond that of merely hunting them as a source of meat.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of

Answer choices

  1. Reversed Order26% picked this

    A set of findings is described and then various explanations of the

    We actually start with the explanation of the findings (they rode these horses!) and then proceed to describe the set of findings.

  2. Reversed Order14% picked this

    A set of specific observations is enumerated and then a general conclusion is drawn

    The general conclusion drawn from the observations (they rode these horses!) is what comes first, and then the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs enumerate the specific observations.

  3. Out of Scope: Principle1% picked this

    A general principle is presented and then examples of the application of the

    There does not seem to be any general principle presented anywhere in the passage (certainly not as the first ingredient), nor do there seem to be examples of a principle.

  4. Correct56% picked this

    A hypothesis is outlined and then a line of reasoning in support of that

    Why this is right

    The hypothesis is our very first sentence (hey, I think they rode these horses!), and then the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs laid our the data, assumptions, and reasoning Olson used to arrive at that hypothesis.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: arguments against2% picked this

    A proposition is stated and then arguments both for and against the

    We definitely open with a proposition (hey, I think they rode these horses!), but there are never any arguments against Olson's proposition summarized in the passage.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free