Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT151 S3 Q22 ExplanationInsurers and doctors are well aware

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Insurers and doctors are well aware that the incidence of lower-back injuries among office workers who spend long hours sitting is higher than that among people who regularly do physical work of a type known to place heavy stresses on the lower furniture are not properly designed to promote workers’ health.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Strengthens (mildly)12% picked this

    When they are at home, laborers and office workers tend to spend similar amounts

    When we're looking for potential differences (causal difference-makers) between two groups, any sort of fact we get that controls for some other variable and makes them fair to compare actually strengthens the argument, by ruling out some form of alternate explanation.

  2. No Impact2% picked this

    Insurance companies tend to dislike selling policies to companies whose workers often claim to

    What insurance companies like / dislike is super far removed from our job of assessing this Causal Mystery of why office workers have a higher rate of lower back injuries.

  3. Too Weak44% picked this

    People who regularly do physical work of a type known to place heavy stress on the lower back are encouraged to use techniques that

    This almost provides an alternate explanation for the curious fact. Why do office workers have a higher rate of lower back injuries than people who do back-stressing physical labor? It's not because the crappy office furniture causes more back injuries. It's because people who have back-stressing jobs are encouraged to use techniques that reduce the stress. However, the fact that they're encouraged to use techniques that reduce stress is too weak. We don't know whether these workers actually DO use these techniques. And even if they do use the techniques, a reduced amount of stress on the lower back might still be more stress than office workers endure, so it wouldn't change the overall scenario of the argument much.

  4. Strengthens3% picked this

    Most of the lower-back injuries that office workers suffer occur while they are

    This helps the plausibility of the author's causal story, which blames the back injuries on office furniture and equipment.

  5. Correct38% picked this

    Consistent physical exercise is one of the most effective ways to prevent or recover

    Why this is right

    This almost provides an alternate explanation for the curious fact. Why do office workers have a higher rate of lower back injuries than people who do back-stressing physical labor? It's not because the crappy office furniture causes more back injuries. It's because "regularly doing physical work that places heavy stresses" constitutes "consistent physical exercise", which is one of the most effective ways to prevent a back injury from occurring or to recover from one that does occur. In other words, the disparity in back injuries between office workers and physical laborers isn't because office work does something bad for the back, but rather because physical work does something good for the back.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free